Dear Zionisti,
For a long time I held to the idea that the Amerindians where, as
described in the Book of Mormon, solely the descendants of the Jaredites
and Lehites. I have had to change my thinking of late. Not because of
the DNA or any other feeble attempt by man to assign broad definitions
to
Message -
From: R. Kent Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 7:50 AM
Subject: Re: [ZION] Caral, Peru 2627 B.C.
Kent wonders:
So does that mean that only the indians in New York are their descendents,
or that the Araucano indians in Southern Chile
Kent Francis writes:
If we look at the Bible as history, the distances involved are less than 500
miles by 100 miles and the area was inhabited by Phoenesian, Philistines,
Syrians, Egyptians and other peoples in addition to the Israelites... who
were at various times in their history
the very first day of their landing in
the New World.
George
- Original Message -
From: Ronn! Blankenship [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 11:26 PM
Subject: Re: [ZION] Caral, Peru 2627 B.C.
At 08:52 PM 8/12/03 -0600, R. Kent Francis wrote:
Kent
At 08:52 PM 8/12/03 -0600, R. Kent Francis wrote:
Kent Francis writes:
If we look at the Bible as history, the distances involved are less than 500
miles by 100 miles and the area was inhabited by Phoenesian, Philistines,
Syrians, Egyptians and other peoples in addition to the Israelites... who
Could mean that this is where all our principals came from. Our
principal was Seminole.
*jeep!
--Chet
Ronn! Blankenship wrote:
Probably due to the statement in the introduction to the BoM which
states that they are the principal ancestors . . .
So Kent wondered:
So does that mean
