On 2007-09-12 15:49:49 +0200, Julien Anguenot [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
Hi there,
Christian Zagrodnick wrote:
Any opinion about this?
I guess the documentation was a little
Hi
On 2007-09-18 12:50:05 +0200, Christian Zagrodnick [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On 2007-09-12 15:49:49 +0200, Julien Anguenot [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Hi there,
Christian Zagrodnick wrote:
Any opinion about this?
I guess the documentation was a little bit ahead of the implementation
at the
On Sep 18, 2007, at 6:50 AM, Christian Zagrodnick wrote:
On 2007-09-12 15:49:49 +0200, Julien Anguenot [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
Hi there,
Christian Zagrodnick wrote:
Any
Hi there,
Christian Zagrodnick wrote:
Any opinion about this?
I guess the documentation was a little bit ahead of the implementation
at the time I did this.
Though, I think the after commit hooks should be called in the abort()
method as well as it might be interesting, as I mentioned it in
On Sep 12, 2007, at 9:49 AM, Julien Anguenot wrote:
Hi there,
Christian Zagrodnick wrote:
Any opinion about this?
I guess the documentation was a little bit ahead of the implementation
at the time I did this.
Though, I think the after commit hooks should be called in the
abort()
Any opinion about this?
On 2007-08-30 15:48:53 +0200, Christian Zagrodnick [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Hi,
the documentation in the _transaction.py reads:
After-commit hook
--
Sometimes, applications want to execute code after a transaction is
committed or aborted. [...] The
