On Mar 3, 2006, at 8:08 AM, Sidnei da Silva wrote:
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 10:03:48PM -0500, Chris McDonough wrote:
| I'm taking a stab at packaging the various pieces of ZODB as eggs.
| One of the things I'd like to do is to separate the packages of ZODB
| that are currently shipped together
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 09:52:43AM -0500, Chris McDonough wrote:
|
| On Mar 3, 2006, at 8:08 AM, Sidnei da Silva wrote:
|
| On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 10:03:48PM -0500, Chris McDonough wrote:
| | I'm taking a stab at packaging the various pieces of ZODB as eggs.
| | One of the things I'd like to do
On Mar 3, 2006, at 10:13 AM, Sidnei da Silva wrote:
| Well, yes. I've already done that. But it's a hack. The runtime
| dependencies aren't a problem, it's the build-time dependencies. I
| don't know of a way to say use this header file from this egg to
| build this other egg in an egg
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 10:20:13AM -0500, Chris McDonough wrote:
| On Mar 3, 2006, at 10:13 AM, Sidnei da Silva wrote:
|
| | Well, yes. I've already done that. But it's a hack. The runtime
| | dependencies aren't a problem, it's the build-time dependencies. I
| | don't know of a way to say
On 3/2/06, Chris McDonough [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 2, 2006, at 10:48 PM, Gary Poster wrote:
On Mar 2, 2006, at 10:03 PM, Chris McDonough wrote:
persistence-3.6.0.egg (which would include persistent and BTrees
modules).
zodblib-3.6.0.egg (which would include ZODB and ZODB
Chris McDonough wrote:
I'm taking a stab at packaging the various pieces of ZODB as eggs. One
of the things I'd like to do is to separate the packages of ZODB that
are currently shipped together (BTrees, ZODB/ZEO, persistent
transaction, ZConfig) into separate packages, because each may
On Mar 3, 2006, at 11:46 AM, Jeremy Hylton wrote:
Go go!
I don't understand the eggs philosophy. (I succeeded in missing the
eggs talk twice at PyCon.) I don't think any of the pieces of ZODB
are very useful in isolation. You can't use persistent without
transaction, and there isn't much
On Mar 3, 2006, at 11:47 AM, Jim Fulton wrote:
BTW, the turbogears folks are interested in using transaction. The
transaction
package has shallow dependencies on ZODB. A nice start would be to
release
a separate transaction egg that doesn't depend on ZODB. (Hint,
we'll need a separate
Sidnei da Silva wrote:
...
Can't you make them separate eggs that depend on the other?
There's no point given the cyclic dependencies. You need everything
anyway, so we might as well have a single source distribution.
BTW, there is no such thing as a source egg, and given that ZODB
has
Chris McDonough wrote:
On Mar 3, 2006, at 11:46 AM, Jeremy Hylton wrote:
Go go!
I don't understand the eggs philosophy. (I succeeded in missing the
eggs talk twice at PyCon.) I don't think any of the pieces of ZODB
are very useful in isolation. You can't use persistent without
transaction,
Chris McDonough wrote at 2006-3-2 22:03 -0500:
...
The ZODB egg
might include both ZODB and ZEO (these are linked inextricably) which
depends on the persistence distribution. Transaction should be
dependency-free (but probably isn't, I haven't gotten that far yet).
While ZEO is of no use
11 matches
Mail list logo
