Jim Fulton wrote:
On Mar 28, 2007, at 6:37 PM, Benji York wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
On Mar 28, 2007, at 6:28 PM, Benji York wrote:
threading.Connection
threading.Condition :)
Yeah, that. :)
What was the time to return the first request after the fix?
I didn't stick around for the
On Thursday 29 March 2007 03:51, Jürgen Kartnaller wrote:
I didn't stick around for the post-Linux-kernel-recompile testing, but
when we hacked the Python standard library to use sleep(0) all the
time (emulating an infinite granularity timer), it went down to about
10 seconds. A pretty
On Mar 29, 2007, at 3:51 AM, Jürgen Kartnaller wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
On Mar 28, 2007, at 6:37 PM, Benji York wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
On Mar 28, 2007, at 6:28 PM, Benji York wrote:
threading.Connection
threading.Condition :)
Yeah, that. :)
What was the time to return the first
Jim Fulton wrote:
On Mar 29, 2007, at 3:51 AM, Jürgen Kartnaller wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
On Mar 28, 2007, at 6:37 PM, Benji York wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
On Mar 28, 2007, at 6:28 PM, Benji York wrote:
threading.Connection
threading.Condition :)
Yeah, that. :)
What was the time
Jim Fulton wrote:
On Mar 29, 2007, at 10:11 AM, Jürgen Kartnaller wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
On Mar 29, 2007, at 3:51 AM, Jürgen Kartnaller wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
On Mar 28, 2007, at 6:37 PM, Benji York wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
On Mar 28, 2007, at 6:28 PM, Benji York wrote:
Okay... I've managed to create a persistent object called 'p' with
the OID of the missing object. I have no idea how to determine the
database connection object to pass it to the
ZODB.Connection.Connection.add() .
-Tim
On 3/27/07, Dieter Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tim Tisdall wrote at
Hello ZODB developers!
I think I asked something like this a very long time ago, but I'd
like to ask again, in case anything has changed.
Here's my question in a short and long version:
short version:
Is anyone using ZEO to build mutliuser networked applications outside
of Zope?
longer
It took me all day, but I finally managed to figure out how to do
what you suggested. Unfortunately, I still get the very same error:
POSKeyError, Error Value: 0x01edf2 . Just to make sure I did it
right, 0x01edf2 is the OID I should use in your solution, right?
-Tim
On 3/29/07, Tim
Tim Tisdall wrote at 2007-3-29 12:02 -0400:
Okay... I've managed to create a persistent object called 'p' with
the OID of the missing object. I have no idea how to determine the
database connection object to pass it to the
ZODB.Connection.Connection.add() .
If you have a persistent object
On Mar 30, 2007, at 5:24 AM, Rodrigo Senra wrote:
[ Robert Gravina ]:
|short version:
|
|Is anyone using ZEO to build mutliuser networked applications outside
|of Zope?
Well, I have developed a trivial in-house desktop-based
employee activity control (Argh!) a couple of years ago.
It
Lennart Regebro wrote at 2007-3-28 18:25 +0200:
On 3/27/07, Dieter Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, this approach is only efficient when the sort index size
is small compared to the result size.
Sure. But with incremental searching, the result size is always one, right? ;-)
No. You
Atmasamarpan Novy wrote at 2007-3-28 11:02 +0200:
...
Problem:
Current ZODB design creates a separate cache for each ZODB connection
(ie. a thread in zope). It means that the same object could be
replicated in each connection cache. We cannot do much about it since we
do not know in advance
Tim Tisdall wrote at 2007-3-29 16:03 -0400:
It took me all day, but I finally managed to figure out how to do
what you suggested. Unfortunately, I still get the very same error:
POSKeyError, Error Value: 0x01edf2 . Just to make sure I did it
right, 0x01edf2 is the OID I should use in your
While doing a 'pack' on a Zope instance that is using multiple
databases, a KeyError 'n' happened. Upon investigation, we found out
that the 'oid_loaders' dictionary used by 'referencesf' (in
ZODB.serialize), which is in turn used by pack (presumably to find the
oids referenced by an object),
Dieter Maurer wrote:
Jim and Tim convinced me that it would not work (at least not without
lots of code insprection for C extensions handling persistent
objects (such as BTrees):
The problem: while an object may be read only on the application
level, it is not read only below this level:
15 matches
Mail list logo
