--On 29. Mai 2005 11:29:06 +0200 Christian Theune [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Samstag, den 21.05.2005, 17:38 +0200 schrieb Christian Heimes:
Grab the Zope2 sources and read lib/python/OFS/Image.py. Zope's
OFS.Image.Image class (and also Zope3's implementation) is using a so
called possible
--On 29. Juni 2005 10:38:27 -0400 Tim Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Andreas Jung]
The Plone guys asked about a 2.8.1 release for end of July/start of
August which should not be a problem. Since they are working on making
Plone 2.1 work with Zope 2.8 there is a good chance that further
--On 13. Oktober 2005 02:44:34 -0400 Chris Spencer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I understand that, but my point was when you call transaction.commit(),
you don't necessarily know what you're committing. One thread may be
ready to commit. Another may not be. If one thread calls
--On 13. Oktober 2005 02:54:51 -0400 Chris Spencer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But what if the client doesn't know what sources it's supposed to have?
What if it only has a limited understanding of the objects, and needs to
load certain objects on the server from scratch. Is this really a
--On 13. Oktober 2005 09:46:43 +0100 Chris Withers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
Sounds like a total insane idea to me to use ZEO to distribute code :-)
Yeah, 'cos ZODB-based Script (Python)'s and ZPT's aren't code :-P
We are basically talking about the common usecase
Possibly a stupid question:
Last night the European clocks switched back to winter-time.
So the ZODB might see multiple timestamps (and unordered transaction) from
transactions happened between 2am and 3am...just for curiosity: is there a
risk getting an inconsistent ZODB?
Andreas
--On 30. Oktober 2005 22:17:44 -0500 Tim Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Second, time-stamp skew doesn't lead to inconsistency.
Fleshing out a bit, ZODB uses time.gmtime() as a starting point, not
necessarily as its final timestamp. When generating a new tid, if
time.gmtime() is = the
--On 4. Dezember 2005 16:32:50 -0500 Chris Spencer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there an existing way to search for objects in ZODB based on criteria?
For example, how could I retrieve all instances of a particular class, or
all objects with a __dict__ key equal to value?
You mean
--On 4. Januar 2006 14:38:13 -0500 Tamas Hegedus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi!
You have released the ZODB/ZEO as a stand alone package. But there is no
stand alone searching possibility. Why? This just does not make any sense.
Yous suggested and I tried Kevin Dangoor's stand alone
--On 4. Januar 2006 15:11:37 -0500 Tamas Hegedus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I am not a programmer. This is the source of all my problems. I just did
not have the patient (and knowledge) to learn to develop zope
applications. But I want to stick with Python and I need a transparent
(object)
--On 9. Januar 2006 16:35:31 +0100 Florent Guillaume [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If that is the case then I intend to:
1. move the definitions of zope's specific levels (trace and blather)
into a more prominent place (ZODB also defines these levels, but it has
to be an independent package),
--On 10. Januar 2006 10:51:04 +0100 Lennart Regebro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I find all this fairly self-evident and highly useful, and se
absolutely zero reason for removing them, when they are so useful.
This decision was made for Zope 2.8 (according to zLOG/__init__.py).
We're now
--On 10. Januar 2006 11:09:32 +0100 Lennart Regebro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 1/10/06, Andreas Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This decision was made for Zope 2.8 (according to zLOG/__init__.py).
How do you mean? As far as I can see, all the levels are still there in
zLOG py
--On 10. Januar 2006 11:44:31 +0100 Lennart Regebro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I don't have an opinion on solution yet.
What I want is something easy to use wher you can just import a log
method or object and make a function. I don't want to set things up,
because if we need to set things up,
--On 26. Mai 2006 16:47:41 +0100 Jens Vagelpohl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 26 May 2006, at 16:43, Benji York wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
You could use a firewall to allow incoming ZEO connection only
from authorized IP address...should
--On 23. Juni 2006 16:05:49 +0200 Adam Groszer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
AJ We run a CMS with several ZEO storages using FileStorage with up 300k
AJ different objects per storage.
May you mention some or some sites on the internet that run Zope/ZODB
to have some examples?
Since ZODB is the
--On 23. Juni 2006 17:51:35 +0200 Florent Guillaume [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTrees perform best when keys' prefixes are randomly distributed.
So if your application generates keys like 'foo001', 'foo002',... you'll
get lots of conflicts. Same for consecutive integers in IOBTree.
--On 24. Juni 2006 21:08:03 +0200 Dieter Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote at 2006-6-24 09:24 +0200:
...
One particular app that I have been working on uses very complex queries
with lots of join etcit would be hard model to implement such
queries on top of the ZODB
--On 25. Juni 2006 21:33:21 +0200 Dieter Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote at 2006-6-24 22:36 +0200:
...
The ZODB model (object data stored in a storage with behaviour
coded in the clients) is powerful enough to simply
implement the relational database data
--On 16. August 2006 10:52:51 +0200 Adam Groszer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Dieter,
Do you think that's possible?
This is not the question. With some effort you can develop almost
everything...you just have to find a volunteer and a budget :-)
-aj
pgpsTnNtwrvDx.pgp
Description: PGP
--On 11. September 2006 16:20:31 -0500 Edward K. Ream
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Several of Leo's users have suggested that Leo could use the zodb instead
of reading and writing files.
Leo?
-aj
pgpYVlVr2dugO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
--On 11. Januar 2007 08:49:31 -0800 Simon Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Do I have any hope of distributing my Persistent objects over multiple
ZEO db's ?
huh? You can mount multiple ZEO servers within one Zope instance.
So where is the problem?
-aj
pgpVUn7kNryKu.pgp
Description: PGP
--On 23. Januar 2007 07:59:55 +0100 Christian Theune [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However by the very nature of our application, everytime we run the
entire process we should discard the old result, keeping the used
space nearly constant.
There are existing storages that support this scenario.
--On 13. Februar 2007 14:31:57 -0500 Tim Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Under the covers someone is trying to invalidate a current ZEO cache
entry, and the ZEO cache is complaining because it doesn't believe it
/has/ current data (assert o is not None). Best guess for why it
doesn't have
--On 13. März 2007 11:47:50 +0100 Jola [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I would like to connect to ZODB using XmlRPC. I used a port number 9675.
Is
the port 9675 correct ?
I run ZODB with such parameters : runzeo.py -a 9675 -f C:\tmp\Data.fs
How told you that nonsense to use ZEO over
--On 13. März 2007 12:53:05 +0100 Jola [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
When I connect to ZODB using XMLRPC, as a server response I got byte
answer
not xml how should I configured server ?
Have you got some fragments of code ? How do it ?
As I told you already (through private mail): you must
--On 13. März 2007 13:10:04 +0100 Jola [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
When I connect to ZODB using XMLRPC, as a server response I got byte
answer
is not xml .
What Should I do ? Maybe should I configured server but How ?
Have you gor similar problem ? Please give me some fragments of code ?
--On 24. März 2007 12:39:32 -0400 Tim Tisdall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Where can I find a fixed version of fsrefs.py? I've been looking
via Google but haven't found anything yet.
If there is one then you'll find it on svn.zope.org.
-aj
pgpiocEhbJI6L.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--On 4. Mai 2007 19:58:47 +0200 Dieter Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote at 2007-5-1 11:23 +0200:
...
I think you are right (as always). Then let me rephrase the question:
how can one distinguish if two transaction objects represent the same or
different transactions
--On 4. Mai 2007 22:33:05 +0100 Laurence Rowe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Following a discussion with several of the sqlalchemy integration authors
on #plone today we came up with the following hack to implement this:
http://dev.plone.org/collective/browser/collective.lead/trunk/collective/
--On 5. Mai 2007 02:46:58 +0200 Andreas Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If commit fails or another DataManager fails, data is not commited to the
database.
However I am not sure if this is completely true. Although this approach
ensures that all SQL statements were execute properly it does
--On 28. Mai 2007 20:03:47 +0200 Joachim Schmitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joachim Schmitz schrieb:
ConflictError: database conflict error (oid 0x7fd771, class
BTrees._IOBTree.IOBucket, serial this txn started with 0x036deefe18489244
2007-05-28 17:34:05.691441, serial currently committed
--On 28. Mai 2007 21:12:13 +0200 Andreas Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--On 28. Mai 2007 20:03:47 +0200 Joachim Schmitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joachim Schmitz schrieb:
ConflictError: database conflict error (oid 0x7fd771, class
BTrees._IOBTree.IOBucket, serial this txn started
--On 25. August 2007 12:04:59 +0200 Harald Vajkonny [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hello,
I just tried to build ZODB3-3.2.10 on my Suse Linux 10.2 machine. After
the build, python test.py produces the following error message:
1) ZODB 3.2 is pretty old (we are at ZODB 3.8 right now)
2) Python
--On 25. August 2007 12:50:59 +0200 Harald Vajkonny [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Andreas Jung schrieb:
1) ZODB 3.2 is pretty old (we are at ZODB 3.8 right now)
2) Python 2.5 and ZODB is unsupported and likely only working with
the latest ZODB versions.
Use the _supported_ Python versions
--On 18. September 2007 12:46:28 +0200 Manuzhai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello there,
For an application I'm working on (implemented mostly in Python), I
was looking for a good solution for our storage needs. First I was
thinking about some tuple- or triple-store, but upon further
reflection
--On 4. Oktober 2007 11:10:22 -0700 Thusjanthan (Nathan) Kubendranathan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To all my fellow zope experts,
I am not very proficient in zope. I need to extract all the data from a
data.fs (zope filesystem) into a database. Basically all it contains is
users and notes
Hi,
running Zope 2.10.5 with Plone 3.0.5. While performing a workflow transition
for all subjects within a tree (roughly about 3000 objects) I encountered
the following error:
:8080/20080112-123756/content_status_history
Traceback (innermost last):
Module ZPublisher.Publish, line 125, in
--On 22. Januar 2008 21:17:45 -0500 Stephan Richter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 22 January 2008, Dieter Maurer wrote:
OracleStorage was abandoned because it was almost an order
or magnitude slower than FileStorage.
Actually, Lovely Systems uses PGStorage because it is faster for
--On 23. Januar 2008 13:32:29 -0600 Alan Runyan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Likely but I don#t know how to setup my instance in order to make the
copied instance making use of mounted catalog.
What about creating a Plone site with a FileStorage.
Then mount a subfolder into PGStorage say
--On 24. Januar 2008 15:42:01 +0100 Andreas Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--On 23. Januar 2008 18:17:18 +0100 Andreas Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--On 22. Januar 2008 21:17:45 -0500 Stephan Richter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 22 January 2008, Dieter Maurer wrote
--On 24. Januar 2008 11:21:28 -0400 David Pratt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi Andreas. No need to rely on rumors. The current source is available
here:
http://pgstorage.cvs.sourceforge.net/pgstorage/
Excellent. I re-tried my benchmarks of course. CopyPaste of a complete new
Plone site
--On 24. Januar 2008 19:13:55 +0100 Dieter Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Izak Burger wrote at 2008-1-24 13:57 +0200:
...
I'm kind of breaking my normal rules of engagement here by immediately
sending mail to a new list I just subscribed to, but then Andreas Jung
did ask me to send a mail
--On 24. Januar 2008 16:48:38 -0200 Leonardo Santagada
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 24/01/2008, at 16:39, Dieter Maurer wrote:
This suggests a route for further investigation:
What causes the reporter's operating system to report file too
large.
This is not a ZODB question but one for
--On 27. Januar 2008 00:26:04 -0700 Shane Hathaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi all,
RelStorage now exists in the Zope subversion repository here:
http://svn.zope.org/relstorage/trunk/
I have also created a wiki page:
http://wiki.zope.org/ZODB/RelStorage
Thanks a lot for the
--On 30. Januar 2008 01:38:17 -0700 Shane Hathaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi guys,
I just committed some performance enhancements to RelStorage, then I
performed two simple speed comparisons with FileStorage using a
stopwatch. I was surprised at the results.
Test #2: I measured the
--On 1. Februar 2008 03:03:53 -0800 Tarek Ziadé [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Since BTrees are written in C, I couldn't add my own conflict manager to
try to merge buckets. (and this is
way over my head)
But you can inherit from the BTree classes and hook your
_p_resolveConflict() handler
--On 5. Februar 2008 00:57:37 + Chris Withers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi All,
Where can I find the zodb tools (fsrefs.py, fstest.py, etc) as
appropriate for the zodb that ships with Zope 2.9.6?
Perhaps in a later release? 2.9.7? 2.9.8?
iirc, 2.9.6 was one of the releases that
--On 12. Februar 2008 15:22:23 -0600 Kenneth Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Where can i find documentation on the BTree modules? All i've been able to
dig up so far are simple examples and slight documentation. Does it not
exist or am I just missing it?
Here is something I wrote a few
--On 27. März 2008 16:09:55 + Chris Withers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi Shane,
How do pack a RelStorage?
Is there a script or do you have to click the button in the control panel?
If there are docs for this, can you point me at them?
Can't you use the standard manage_pack()
--On 23. April 2008 09:20:00 -0600 Shane Hathaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
I would like to get that fix in for Zope 2.11, which will use ZODB 3.8.
Are there any objections to changing this there as well? This is a bit
of a grey area between a bugfix and completing
--On 23. April 2008 09:39:57 -0600 Shane Hathaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 23. April 2008 09:20:00 -0600 Shane Hathaway
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
AFAIK, Jim is working on major ZODB changes for ZODB 3.9. Could we move
those major changes into ZODB 3.10
--On 23. April 2008 09:39:57 -0600 Shane Hathaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 23. April 2008 09:20:00 -0600 Shane Hathaway
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
AFAIK, Jim is working on major ZODB changes for ZODB 3.9. Could we move
those major changes into ZODB 3.10
--On 13. Mai 2008 10:36:48 +0200 Vincent Pelletier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi.
_register method of TM class in Shared/DC/ZRDB/TM.py hides all exceptions.
This makes descendants of this class prone to get stuck in a registered
state withtout any possibility of them to get commited.
To
--On 13. Mai 2008 20:08:15 +0200 Dieter Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote at 2008-5-13 10:44 +0200:
...
Is there any reason why TM._register is hiding exceptions ?
Isn't the right approach for integrating a module with ZODB transactions
using a ZODB DataManager
--On 18. Juni 2008 12:03:10 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have a large dataset of 650,000+ records that I'd like to examine
easily in Python. I have figured out how to put this into a ZODB file
that totals 4 GB in size. But I'm new to ZODB and very large databases,
and have a few
--On 19. Juni 2008 14:31:47 +0200 Martijn Faassen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi there,
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 1:38 PM, Christian Theune [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
We propose to keep both implementations around and allow to select which
one to use. We would extend the FileSystemHelper
--On 22. Juni 2008 08:49:32 -0700 tsmiller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Gary,
I have been using the ZODB for about a year and a half with a bookstore
application. I am just now about ready to put it out on the internet for
people to use. I have had the same problem with saving data. I have
--On 2. Juli 2008 16:45:53 -0400 Joseph Turian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How do I lock zodb objects?
Zope provides locking for WebDAV under the hood. Means you can not
lock/unlock objects directly through the Zope UI (except the global webdav
lock manager in the ZMI for _unlocking_
--On 31. Juli 2008 18:53:18 +0100 Chris Withers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
The most recent releases of ZODB 3.8 have *numerous* cache-management
fixes. They also lock persistent cache files so you can't corrupt them
by trying to open them in multiple processes. Some of the
--On 31. Juli 2008 14:53:05 -0400 Fred Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 2:15 PM, Andreas Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They aren't part of the ZODB 3.8 but part of the trunk/3.9 - right?
These are bug fixes, and will be included in ZODB 3.8.1.
So we will see those
--On 3. August 2008 13:42:27 +0300 Malka Cymbalista
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks very much for your answer.
We need ZODB3.4 because we are installing the Cern Document Server Indico
package and this needs python 2.4 or later. We already had python 2.3.4
but we installed pythin 2.5
On 31.10.2008 22:17 Uhr, Christophe Combelles wrote:
Tim Cook a écrit :
Does anyone know of any work being done on a PyTables
http://www.pytables.org storage?
No, but I might be interested in such a thing, since I've created last year a
medical data analysis software on which I encountered
On 01.11.2008 13:17 Uhr, David Pratt wrote:
Hi guys.
repoze has package is useful for solving the transaction management issue.
http://svn.repoze.org/repoze.tm2
That's basically the same as the transaction of Zope. It does not make a
third-party backend automatically transaction - although
On 15.11.2008 16:11 Uhr, Jim Fulton wrote:
On Nov 15, 2008, at 10:03 AM, Andreas Jung wrote:
Hi there,
is there a way to analyze the data committed during one transaction?
The current usecase is Plone. A simple change to a document causes a
large transaction (between 30k and 100k even
On 05.12.2008 17:15 Uhr, Adam wrote:
Hi all,
Is there a roadmap for getting ZODB to work on Python 3 or is that
beyond the realms of possibility?
Possibly, using a Python 2 ZEO server and connecting using a Python 3
ClientStorage?
The general goal in the Zope world right now is to support
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 23.01.2009 17:41 Uhr, Sandra wrote:
Hi,
I am try to understand, why Relstorage was been create, Could you help
me Shane, what was your motivations? Have you any documentation about
Relstorage?
and in oder side could we said that, the technic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 26.03.2009 10:10 Uhr, Sandra wrote:
Hello!
I want to use ZcxOracleDA, i have install cx-oracle 4.4.1 and
extract ZcxOracleDA into my Zope instances Products directory, but
it does'nt appear in Control_panel/ Products in ZMI.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 30.03.2009 12:10 Uhr, Sandra wrote:
Hello!
Could someone please tell me the difference between the RAM and the
Cache of ZODB?
This question does not make sense to me. What do you want to know in detail?
- -aj
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01.04.2009 14:17 Uhr, Sandra wrote:
Anybody knows any way to solve
it ?
N.B: i am using Relstorage + Oracle 10i.
You might want to use the Python debugger pdb and figure out where the
code hangs - either within your application or somewhere in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 25.04.2009 um 12:14 schrieb Udasi, Anurag (GE Healthcare):
We are using ZODB [in Zenoss] and we would like to browse Zenoss'
ZODB schema. How can we do this? Also, how can we create our own
tables, etc? Any links, documentation? Thanks!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 25.04.2009 um 12:14 schrieb Udasi, Anurag (GE Healthcare):
We are using ZODB [in Zenoss] and we would like to browse Zenoss'
ZODB schema. How can we do this? Also, how can we create our own
tables, etc? Any links, documentation? Thanks!
On 27.04.2009 15:13 Uhr, Jim Fulton wrote:
Note that ZODB 3.9 is pretty stable. We're using it in production. It
is alpha mainly because Shane and I are still sorting out integration
of RelStorage.
Speaking of ZODB 3.9 - when do you expect going beta (I know it's done
when it is done) since
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 14:27, Jim Fulton j...@zope.com wrote:
On Apr 28, 2009, at 1:06 AM, Andreas Jung wrote:
On 27.04.2009 15:13 Uhr, Jim Fulton wrote:
Note that ZODB 3.9 is pretty stable. We're using it in production. It
is alpha mainly because Shane and I are still sorting out
On 04.05.09 21:03, Jim Fulton wrote:
I've just released the first beta of ZODB 3.9.
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/ZODB3/3.9.0b1
3.9 features are now frozen. I'd prefer to keep new features off of
the trunk for a while to reduce the amount of merging work I have to
do. :)
Please try
I fixed this problem in Zope 2 and released Zope 2.12.0b1
with ZODB 3.9.0b1 today.
Andreas
On 04.05.09 21:23, Jim Fulton wrote:
On May 4, 2009, at 3:09 PM, Andreas Jung wrote:
On 04.05.09 21:03, Jim Fulton wrote:
I've just released the first beta of ZODB 3.9.
http://pypi.python.org/pypi
On 14.05.09 08:29, Dganit David wrote:
Hi
We are new to zope,
We are planning a web application that saves the data of up to
1,000,000 users.
This is a pointless number. The estimated total number of objects is
relevant.
I would like to know the limitation of zodb.
Currently
On 14.05.09 11:59, Chris Bainbridge wrote:
2009/5/14 Dganit David dgani...@puresight.com:
We are planning a web application that saves the data of up to 1,000,000
users.
I would like to know the limitation of zodb.
Currently we are using ClientStorage with zeo,
In my
On 26.05.09 18:54, Laurence Rowe wrote:
A few weeks ago I converted the ZODB/ZEO Programming Guide and a few
more articles into structured text and added them to the zope2docs
buildout. I've now moved them to their own buildout in
svn+ssh://svn.zope.org/repos/main/zodbdocs/trunk and they
On 26.05.09 19:08, Andreas Jung wrote:
On 26.05.09 18:54, Laurence Rowe wrote:
A few weeks ago I converted the ZODB/ZEO Programming Guide and a few
more articles into structured text and added them to the zope2docs
buildout. I've now moved them to their own buildout in
svn+ssh
On 22.06.09 16:56, Pedro Ferreira wrote:
Hello all,
We occasionally get some messages like this in the logs:
2009-06-22T14:12:42 (30651/137.138.128.213:35787) Transaction blocked
waiting for storage. Clients waiting: 1.
But today we eventually got to:
2009-06-22T16:00:11
On 22.06.09 17:37, Jim Fulton wrote:
On Jun 22, 2009, at 11:31 AM, Alan Runyan wrote:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Andreas Jungli...@zopyx.com wrote:
On 22.06.09 16:56, Pedro Ferreira wrote:
Hello all,
We occasionally get some messages like this in the logs:
2009-06-22T14:12:42
How about seek()ing to the end of the blob and then using tell() for getting
the position?
Andreas
On 07.07.09 15:11, KLEIN Stéphane wrote:
Hi,
I've take cognizance of ZODB.Blob. I think it's great tools.
Know, I've one question : how can I get the size (in octet) of Blob
object ?
f
Hi Jim,
there is a ZODB 3.8.2 release but there is no SVN tag for 3.8.2.
Also the 3.8 branch does not contain the information from the
release notes that are present on PyPI. You missed to commit
your local SVN changes?
Andreas
--
ZOPYX Ltd. Co KG \ ZOPYX Friends
Charlottenstr.
And what has this to do with ZODB?
-aj
On 04.09.09 05:54, tsmiller wrote:
Hello,
I am POSTing from qooxdoo using the io2.HttpRequest and somewhere in the
transport my data is getting messed up. My data leaving the client is a
valid stringified dictionary (data = qx.util.Json.stringify( data
On 14.09.09 13:27, Chris Withers wrote:
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
Sadly, when you're trying to figure out which folder is using all the
space on a disk that's running out of space, that's not practical...
How about simply writing a script that crawls the ZODB and gives you
Am 25.09.09 16:54, schrieb Pedro Ferreira:
Hello,
I was trying to migrate a machine from 3.8.1 to 3.9.0, but I'm getting
the following error:
2009-09-25T16:34:35 (2606) new connection ('137.138.4.155', 45551):
ManagedServerConnection ('137.138.4.155', 45551)
2009-09-25T16:34:35
Hi there,
we are in the situation that we are running Zope 2.11 with heavily
patched ZODB 3.8 with this extension:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/zodb/+spec/dm-pack-optimization
While packing a storage we figured out that this extension is
not compatible with the ZODB versions feature -
(although still alpha or beta) appears
promising. But the speed has its price: only atomicity for single
document entities.
Andreas
Andreas Jung www.zopyx.com i...@zopyx.com mailto:i...@zopyx.com
CEO
ZOPYX Ltd. Co. KG
attachment: lists.vcf___
The project - at least enterprise-level projects - requires are careful
choice of the tools and backends. The ZODB is the golden bullet for all
and everything. Depending on the data model and the project needs you
have to
look at relational database or NOSQL databases as alternatives.
And as you
Am 09.12.09 16:54, schrieb Pedro Ferreira:
We could use an OOBTree instead... but something less
complex would suffice... any suggestions?
OOBTrees are complex?
-aj
attachment: lists.vcf___
For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Aspeli wrote:
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
What is zc.beforestorage?
Look at its PyPi page
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/zc.beforestorage
Thanks for the pointer!
There is also dm.historical when you need to deal with earlier versions
of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Fulton wrote:
I propose to drop Python 2.4 support in ZODB 3.10, mainly so I can use
the with statement to clean up the code.
Any objections?
No objections from the Zope 2 side.
Andreas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi there,
we have some huge ZODB file storage (60-80 GB each) and we want
to split the storage into a number of smaller storage (easier
to handle for backup and packing). The storages themselves only
contain a few (Zope 2) folders - let's say
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi there,
we had in the past several issues with hour-long outages of our
ZEO servers. The reasons are pretty easy: with have several big
storages (60-80GB) and in case of a cluster failures we were not able
to shutdown the ZEO servers in a clean
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Fulton wrote:
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 3:39 AM, Andreas Jung li...@zopyx.com
wrote:
we had in the past several issues with hour-long outages of our
ZEO servers. The reasons are pretty easy: with have several big
storages (60-80GB) and in case
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Fulton wrote:
Another issue is that, as things are now, while an index is being
saved, no transactions can be committed. This is less serious now
that saving indexes is much faster, however, saving a large index
may still take several
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi there,
I am trying to check a Data.fs as used under Zope 2.10 for Poskey errors.
Running fsrefs gives me the following:
pl...@diaweb06:/data/zeo_buildout$ bin/zopepy
./parts/zope2/utilities/ZODBTools/fsrefs.py labor.fs.kaputt
Traceback (most
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Fulton wrote:
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Andreas Jung li...@zopyx.com
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
Jim Fulton wrote:
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Sidnei da Silva
sidnei.da.si...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to the ZODB 3.10 release notes we will have dedicated
processes on the ZEO server side for each client connection. What will
be the major benefits of this change?
Our typical scenario is like this: we run 5-6 ZEO servers where each
server
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
