Hi ,
I am facing an issue with rcapd, currently I have setup 8 sparse-root
containers on a server with 32G physical memory , I have capped each of these
containers varyingly and there is no issue with capping and it works fine.
The issue arises when one of the containers eats up more memory
Hi Syed,
I would not be surprised to find that rcapd is behaving correctly on
your system. All of the containers in one Solaris instance share one
Solaris paging system and one set of swap devices. When rcapd is
paging the memory pages of one container out to the swap device, other
workloads
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 6:55 AM, syed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi ,
I am facing an issue with rcapd, currently I have setup 8
sparse-root containers on a server with 32G physical memory, I
have capped each of these containers varyingly and there is no issue
with capping and it works fine.
Hi Mike,
I think you are right, using rcapd for virtulization using zones would be a
problem,
thanks for the work around , really appreciate your help.
Regards
uzair
--- On Mon, 9/1/08, Mike Gerdts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Mike Gerdts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [zones-discuss]
After more investigation, moving filesystem/local to single-user
milestone is not an option when Sun Cluster or Sun Storagetek
AVS comes into play.
-- Renaud
Narendra Kumar S.S wrote:
Jordan,
Is there any particular reason, why you are not proposing to move
filesystem/local to
Sure :-)
Both Sun Cluster and AVS introduce new services. Some of them
(eg. global-devices system/nws_scm) are dependent on
milestone/single-user and add filesystem/local as their dependent.
If we were to move filesystem/local into ms/single-user,
it would create a dependency loop between those
