Hi,
Does this code modify rcapd to properly account for shared memory?
That particular feature was mentioned in the case materials for PSARC
2006/496, but I wasn't clear on whether it made it in or not.
TIA,
Allan
On 06/02/2007, at 4:42 PM, Jerry Jelinek wrote:
Mike,
Mike Gerdts
On Mon 05 Feb 2007 at 10:17PM, Mike Gerdts wrote:
I just got a chance to start playing with the capped memory resource
controls in build 56. At first blush, this looks to be *very* good
stuff. My initial testing included some very basic single process
memory hog tests and multiple process
Mike,
Mike Gerdts wrote:
One of the effects of setting capped-memory resource control for swap
is that the size of /tmp is also limited. Unlike when a tmpfs size
limit is set with the size=... mount option, df /tmp does not
display a value that is reflective of the limits that are put in
On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 10:17:42PM -0600, Mike Gerdts wrote:
I just got a chance to start playing with the capped memory resource
controls in build 56. At first blush, this looks to be *very* good
stuff. My initial testing included some very basic single process
memory hog tests and multiple
I just got a chance to start playing with the capped memory resource
controls in build 56. At first blush, this looks to be *very* good
stuff. My initial testing included some very basic single process
memory hog tests and multiple process mmap(..., MAP_SHARED,...) tests.
In each case, the
