Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.2.1 (candidate 0)]]

2009-09-04 Thread Bernd Fondermann
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 18:25, Patrick Huntph...@apache.org wrote: The configure script is free license (it's in the header of the file). IANAL but based on my understanding of apache license requirements this makes the file a TYPE A license, as there are no other stated requirements wrt

Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.2.1 (candidate 0)]]

2009-09-04 Thread Bernd Fondermann
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 19:10, Owen O'Malleyo...@yahoo-inc.com wrote: Bernd Fondermann wrote: I'm not saying that the license is incompatible, I am saying that you need to record third party contributions in the NOTICE file. The critical reference is:

Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.2.1 (candidate 0)]]

2009-09-04 Thread Owen O'Malley
Bernd Fondermann wrote: I'm not saying that the license is incompatible, I am saying that you need to record third party contributions in the NOTICE file. The critical reference is: http://ftp.gnu.org/old-gnu/Manuals/autoconf-2.53/html_node/Distributing.html#Distributing In particular, the

Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.2.1 (candidate 0)]]

2009-09-04 Thread Bernd Fondermann
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 18:12, Patrick Huntph...@apache.org wrote: Bernd Fondermann wrote: On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 18:25, Patrick Huntph...@apache.org wrote: The configure script is free license (it's in the header of the file). IANAL but based on my understanding of apache license

Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.2.1 (candidate 0)]]

2009-09-04 Thread Bernd Fondermann
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 20:43, Patrick Huntph...@apache.org wrote: Bernd Fondermann wrote: Well, I'm not guessing any more than you do. :-) :-) I didn't -1, because I've no binding vote anyway on this PMC. I just checked out the release and gave feedback, whether it's appreciated or not

Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.2.1 (candidate 0)]]

2009-09-04 Thread Patrick Hunt
Bernd Fondermann wrote: Well, I'm not guessing any more than you do. :-) :-) I didn't -1, because I've no binding vote anyway on this PMC. I just checked out the release and gave feedback, whether it's appreciated or not I'm not quite sure. We take all serious votes seriously. Imperative

Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.2.1 (candidate 0)]]

2009-09-04 Thread Patrick Hunt
No worries. Thanks for pointing this out. I'm not against giving credit where it's due, so while may be disagreement on whether this is required or not I'm happy to add this to the notice. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-521 If you have any comments on the suggested text

Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.2.1 (candidate 0)]]

2009-09-03 Thread Bernd Fondermann
Hi, There is foreign code in the release tar ball, which is not attributed to in the top-level LICENSE/NOTICE file. see for example src/c/configure So I guess it is not safe to release this as-is. It would be nice if the release artifacts would be named apache-zookeeper... but this more my

Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.2.1 (candidate 0)]]

2009-09-03 Thread Patrick Hunt
The configure script is free license (it's in the header of the file). IANAL but based on my understanding of apache license requirements this makes the file a TYPE A license, as there are no other stated requirements wrt notice, we are in compliance. Patrick Bernd Fondermann wrote: Hi,

Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.2.1 (candidate 0)

2009-09-03 Thread Patrick Hunt
: Friday, August 28, 2009 11:21 AM To: zookeeper-dev@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.2.1 (candidate 0) I've created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.2.1. This is a bug fix release addressing a number of significant issues -- see the release notes for details. *** Please download

RE: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.2.1 (candidate 0)

2009-09-02 Thread Benjamin Reed
+1 looks good. ben From: Patrick Hunt [ph...@apache.org] Sent: Friday, August 28, 2009 11:21 AM To: zookeeper-dev@hadoop.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.2.1 (candidate 0) I've created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.2.1. This is a bug fix

Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.2.1 (candidate 0)

2009-09-01 Thread Patrick Hunt
+1 Mahadev Konar wrote: +1 the tests run fine for me. Also ran a bunch of smoke tests with killing servers and bringning them up at randome intervals. It all worked fine. Thanks mahadev On 8/31/09 2:52 PM, Flavio Junqueira f...@yahoo-inc.com wrote: +1. I've run a number of live tests,

Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.2.1 (candidate 0)

2009-08-31 Thread Flavio Junqueira
+1. I've run a number of live tests, including some cross-colo tests, and it runs fine for me. -Flavio On Aug 28, 2009, at 8:21 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote: I've created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.2.1. This is a bug fix release addressing a number of significant issues -- see the release

Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.2.1 (candidate 0)

2009-08-31 Thread Mahadev Konar
+1 the tests run fine for me. Also ran a bunch of smoke tests with killing servers and bringning them up at randome intervals. It all worked fine. Thanks mahadev On 8/31/09 2:52 PM, Flavio Junqueira f...@yahoo-inc.com wrote: +1. I've run a number of live tests, including some cross-colo

[VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.2.1 (candidate 0)

2009-08-28 Thread Patrick Hunt
I've created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.2.1. This is a bug fix release addressing a number of significant issues -- see the release notes for details. *** Please download, test and VOTE before the *** vote closes EOD on Wednesday, September 2.***