We're working on hbase 0.21 as being the first hbase that shows up in a maven repo. St.Ack
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Mahadev Konar <maha...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote: > Unfortunately no.. We are planning to deploy 3.3 as the first version on > maven repo. > > > Thanks > mahadev > > > On 1/22/10 12:58 PM, "Ted Dunning" <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Is ZK 3.2.2 in a maven repository somewhere? >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: Drew Farris <drew.far...@gmail.com> >> Date: Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 11:47 AM >> Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (MAHOUT-238) Further Dependency Cleanup >> To: mahout-...@lucene.apache.org >> >> >> Neither hbase 0.20.2 nor zookeeper (any version) appear to be in a >> maven repo at this point, so Mahout would have to roll and deploy >> these. What was the process that was followed to build and deploy the >> mahout-packaged hadoop 0.20.1 and hbase artifacts? Is this something I >> could submit a patch to Mahout for, or better left for the committers? >> >> As Ted pointed out, yes the release of zk is 3.2.2 >> >> Drew >> >> On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 5:12 AM, zhao zhendong <zhaozhend...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> Hi Drew, >>> >>> I propose to >>> 1) update hbase-0.20.0.jar to hbase-0.20.2.jar due to the later is stable >>> and hbased-platform is based on this version, >>> >>> 2) and add zookeeper-3.2.1.jar. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Zhendong >>> >>> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 12:36 PM, zhao zhendong <zhaozhend...@gmail.com >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Drew, >>>> >>>> Including a source code in snapshots that will be great. >>>> >>>> Currently, the HDFS reader does not work in 0.20.2. Without source code, >>>> it's not convenient for me to debug the code. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Zhendong >>>> >>>> On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 12:25 AM, Drew Farris <drew.far...@gmail.com >>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I wonder if we can get the hadoop people to include source jars with >>>>> their snapshots? >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Sean Owen <sro...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> I need a fix after 0.20.1, that's the primary reason. As a bonus, we >>>>>> don't have to maintain our own version. The downside is relying on a >>>>>> SNAPSHOT, but seems worth it to me. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 4:02 PM, zhao zhendong <zhaozhend...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> Thanks Drew, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 for me to maintain a stable hadoop release, such as 0.20.1. The >>>>> reason is >>>>>>> obvious :) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>> Zhendong >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> >>>> Zhen-Dong Zhao (Maxim) >>>> >>>> <><<><><><><><><><>><><><><><>>>>>> >>>> >>>> Department of Computer Science >>>> School of Computing >>>> National University of Singapore >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> <><><><><><><><<><>><><<<<<< >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> ------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> Zhen-Dong Zhao (Maxim) >>> >>> <><<><><><><><><><>><><><><><>>>>>> >>> >>> Department of Computer Science >>> School of Computing >>> National University of Singapore >>> >>>>>>>>>> <><><><><><><><<><>><><<<<<< >>> >> >> > >
