Am Donnerstag, den 01.11.2007, 23:43 -0400 schrieb Chris McDonough:
In summary:
[...]
I think fixing this sort of stuff is important if it's a goal to allow
people to use Zope technologies outside of Zope-the-appserver. I'd
like to participate by making new releases, but I'm not sure
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope trunk 2.4 Windows 2000
zc-bbwin6.
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/
Build Reason: changes
Build Source Stamp: 3077
Blamelist:
chrism,geroldboehler,hannosch,janwijbrand,jukart,kteague,rogerineichen,srichter
BUILD FAILED: failed test
On Friday 02 November 2007, Benji York wrote:
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Friday 02 November 2007, Benji York wrote:
Why the test extra?
to get it working. :-) There were several packages required by
ftesting.zcml.
We generally put those in install_requires and eschew extras.
zope.file
On Friday 02 November 2007, Christian Theune wrote:
I see that there is a special 'tests_require' in setuptools anyway. We
could give up on extras using tests_require if the testrunner recipe (or
buildout) knew how to handle those.
Yes, I think this would be the way to go. I have seen this
Stephan Richter wrote:
zope.file was the *only* package of the 150+ I worked on that did not have
extras.
I'm surprised. I thought it was generally agreed upon not to do that.
Darn.
--
Benji York
Senior Software Engineer
Zope Corporation
___
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 02.11.2007, 10:23 -0400 schrieb Stephan Richter:
On Friday 02 November 2007, Benji York wrote:
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Friday 02 November 2007, Benji York wrote:
Why the test extra?
to get it working. :-) There were several packages required by
Stephan Richter wrote:
Overall I am in favor in switching to 'test_require'.
If I recall correctly, test_require doesn't actually do anything. :)
--
Benji York
Senior Software Engineer
Zope Corporation
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
On Friday 02 November 2007, Christian Theune wrote:
I think that extras for tests are a necessary evil until we have
unscrewed the dependencies of the functional test setups.
Depends on what 'unscrew' means. Functional test setups might want to
demonstrate more in-depth, real-life scenarios
Stephan Richter wrote:
Log message for revision 81401:
Make a good package out of this package.
Changed:
A zope.file/trunk/CHANGES.txt
A zope.file/trunk/README.txt
U zope.file/trunk/buildout.cfg
U zope.file/trunk/setup.py
+ extras_require = dict(
+
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeff Kowalczyk wrote:
Would it be possible to have a non-system python installed (by default
into /opt/python24) by the system python easy_install? I think it would be
useful to have eggs that provide commands on the path such as
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 02.11.2007, 10:53 -0400 schrieb Stephan Richter:
I only know of the general problem and not the specific one. Let's say you
have a package A with extras AE1 and AE2. Then you really have to write tests
for three installation cases: A, A with AE1, A with AE2. Currently we
On Nov 2, 2007, at 1:04 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Benji York wrote:
Stephan Richter wrote:
Overall I am in favor in switching to 'test_require'.
If I recall correctly, test_require doesn't actually do
anything. :)
setuptools installs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Benji York wrote:
Stephan Richter wrote:
Overall I am in favor in switching to 'test_require'.
If I recall correctly, test_require doesn't actually do anything. :)
setuptools installs 'tests_requires' dependencies when you run tests
from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christian Theune wrote:
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 02.11.2007, 10:23 -0400 schrieb Stephan Richter:
On Friday 02 November 2007, Benji York wrote:
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Friday 02 November 2007, Benji York wrote:
Why the test extra?
to get it
On Friday 02 November 2007, Benji York wrote:
Why the test extra?
to get it working. :-) There were several packages required by ftesting.zcml.
Regards,
Stephan
--
Stephan Richter
CBU Physics Chemistry (B.S.) / Tufts Physics (Ph.D. student)
Web2k - Web Software Design, Development and
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Thu Nov 1 13:00:00 2007 UTC to Fri Nov 2 13:00:00 2007 UTC.
There were 5 messages: 5 from Zope Unit Tests.
Tests passed OK
---
Subject: OK : Zope-2.7 Python-2.3.6 : Linux
From: Zope Unit Tests
Date: Thu Nov 1 21:48:08 EDT 2007
On 11/1/07, Peter Sabaini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I always wondered -- I never had any trouble with the system Pythons, or at
least not a problem that I could attribute to a system Python (Debian Stable
and Ubuntu LTS)
Well, try and easy_install i18ndude, and see all your Zope2 instances
Roché Compaan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Where can one find Zope 3 catalog? Or is it simply zope.index?
I think zope.app.catalog is what you're looking for.
Ross
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Friday 02 November 2007, Benji York wrote:
Why the test extra?
to get it working. :-) There were several packages required by ftesting.zcml.
We generally put those in install_requires and eschew extras.
--
Benji York
Senior Software Engineer
Zope Corporation
Where can one find Zope 3 catalog? Or is it simply zope.index?
--
Roché Compaan
Upfront Systems http://www.upfrontsystems.co.za
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross
On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 11:44 -0700, Ross Patterson wrote:
Roché Compaan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Where can one find Zope 3 catalog? Or is it simply zope.index?
I think zope.app.catalog is what you're looking for.
Thanks. I was looking at the Zope 3 version distributed with Zope 2.10
which
Roché Compaan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 11:44 -0700, Ross Patterson wrote:
Roché Compaan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Where can one find Zope 3 catalog? Or is it simply zope.index?
I think zope.app.catalog is what you're looking for.
Thanks. I was looking at the Zope
So doing some more routing around on the lists I saw this advice
FWIW you
might want to call the query or execute methods directly on the DA
connection object if they are supported.
Therefore my db connection object is
ado_db_connection. Modifying my code to the below and calling the
query
ok, thanks Duncan
ul
li tal:define=query nocall:here/testquery tal:repeat=result
python:query(id='IT')
span tal:replace=result/lastnamelastname goes here/span
/li
/ul
works! I went down a blind alley with calling the database adapter due to
confusion over the error message produced. Backs up my
michael nt milne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
li tal:define = query here/testquery
tal:repeat=result python:query(id='IT')
span tal:replace=python:repeat['result'].firstnameFirst
Name/spannbsp;
/li
but get this as a result. Thanks for the reply.
Module
ps for completeness
here is the testquery ZSQL which works fine when tested in the ZMI and
manually inputting the id variable.
select * from tblEmployees where department = (dtml-sqlvar id
type=string) order by 'location'
I have 'id' in the argument field
Thanks
On 11/2/07, michael nt milne
Hi Michael
michael nt milne schrieb:
yeah I have modified to this
li tal:define = query here/testquery
tal:repeat=result python:query(id='IT')
span tal:replace=python:repeat['result'].firstnameFirst
Name/spannbsp;
/li
but get this as a result. Thanks for the reply.
Module
Hi Josef
ul
li tal:define=query here/testquery tal:repeat=result
python:query(id='IT')
span tal:replace=repeat/resultfirstname goes here/span
/li
/ul
gives the same
AttributeError: Results instance has no __call__ method
As does
span tal:replace=repeat/result/firstnameFirst Name/span
As
The only point being backed up by this thread, IMO, is that Thou
shalt not code in TALES.
Stefan
On 2. Nov 2007, at 12:53, michael nt milne wrote:
Backs up my point about more
friendly and usable error messages.
--
Anything that, in happening, causes something else to happen,
causes
So use DTML? Or NKOTB? :-)
On 11/2/07, Stefan H. Holek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The only point being backed up by this thread, IMO, is that Thou
shalt not code in TALES.
Stefan
On 2. Nov 2007, at 12:53, michael nt milne wrote:
Backs up my point about more
friendly and usable error
30 matches
Mail list logo
