Hi!
Please consider this TALES expression:
div class=DataPrevista tal:content='here/getDataInici | string: nosta' /
If I try this other: div tal:content='string:${here/getDataInici}' / the
result is divNone/div
Then the first one will render the alternate expression isn't it?
Then with it
Hi!
Please consider this TALES expression:
div class=DataPrevista tal:content='here/getDataInici | string:
nosta' /
If I try this other: div tal:content='string:${here/getDataInici}' /
the result is divNone/div
Then the first one will render the alternate expression isn't it?
Then with
I modify the rewrite rule
VirtualHost xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
ServerName mydomain.org
RewriteEngine On
RewriteRule ^/article/view/([0-9]*)/(.*) /archieve/$1 [R]
RewriteRule ^/zoperoot(.*)
http://xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:8080/VirtualHostBase/http/mydomain.org:80/VirtualHostRoot/_vh_zoperoot$1
[P,L]
If this assuption is correct why the result is div class=DataPrevista /?
2008/7/16 Martijn Jacobs [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
That assumption is correct
I mean some TALES expression as here/getDataInici | string: nosta will
evaluate here/getDataInici and if this expression returns '', 0 or None the
Hello,
On several zope 2.10.6 instances we discovered issues with database
connections to MySQL. Apparently MySQL seems to not automaticly
reconnect connections with a timeout since version 5.0.3 due to issues
with transactions.
Until now, mysql-python was patched to restore that behaviour to
Garito wrote:
Hi!
Please consider this TALES expression:
div class=DataPrevista tal:content='here/getDataInici | string: nosta' /
If I try this other: div tal:content='string:${here/getDataInici}' /
the result is divNone/div
Then the first one will render the alternate expression isn't it?
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 6:34 AM, Tino Wildenhain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You should check the tales documentation. the pipe symbol |
means a logical or, in effect if the left expression resolves
to non existent, None, empty object,... (generally python False)
the right part of it is
I don't have an easy answer but if you do dig into Andy's code and try
to implement this, I would suggest you look at the ZPsycopgDA code
perhaps and look for inspiration since I think that one works much
better.
2008/7/16 Jonas [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
On several zope 2.10.6 instances we
Fred Drake wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 6:34 AM, Tino Wildenhain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You should check the tales documentation. the pipe symbol |
means a logical or, in effect if the left expression resolves
to non existent, None, empty object,... (generally python False)
the right part
Hi,
I have an old zope based site that was hosted on a linux machine that
was exported to a zexp. i am trying to import it onto a windows
machine to fix up and upgrade the site. the windows machine is setup
wth the identical products etc. The problem is the image file paths
for linux
From: Richard Ettema [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with windows for development. Is there a way of getting the import
procedure to ignore the errors and continue the import (i.e. any hints on
how to modify the zope code)? Or is there a way to edit the zexp to do a
search remove/replace of the file path
Quoting Jaroslav Lukesh [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
You need to export your website folder as ZEXP in XML format. Then you
could edit this file at search/replace basis. But before this, try to
re-import this ZEXP file, if it is able to import (not all zexp exports
are able to reimport).
Regards, JL.
Richard Ettema schrieb:
Hi,
I have an old zope based site that was hosted on a linux machine that
was exported to a zexp. i am trying to import it onto a windows machine
to fix up and upgrade the site. the windows machine is setup wth the
identical products etc. The problem is the image file
Log message for revision 88409:
'creating tag svn+ssh://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/repos/main/Zope/tags/2.11.1 from
svn+ssh://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/repos/main/Zope/branches/2.11'
Changed:
A Zope/tags/2.11.1/
-=-
Copied: Zope/tags/2.11.1 (from rev 88408, Zope/branches/2.11)
Am Mittwoch, 16. Juli 2008 05:48 schrieb Florian Friesdorf:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 09:50:25AM +0200, Hermann Himmelbauer wrote:
(..)
1) No way to pass PAU-related information to form-code: In PAU, the
(..)
2) Lack of documentation: The entities Principal, InternalPrincipal,
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Tue Jul 15 11:00:00 2008 UTC to Wed Jul 16 11:00:00 2008 UTC.
There were 5 messages: 5 from Zope Tests.
Tests passed OK
---
Subject: OK : Zope-2.8 Python-2.3.6 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Tue Jul 15 21:01:04 EDT 2008
URL:
Chris Withers wrote:
Hi All,
Just me, or is it excessive that we have:
http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope3-checkins/
This one is obsolete now.
http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-checkins/
This one is for Zope 2 only.
http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/checkins/
This one covers the
Tres Seaver wrote:
Mark Hammond wrote:
Well, Zope moved onwards from PAS to PAU
I doubt that seriously: I would venture that there are two orders of
magnitude more users of PAS than PAU in production deployments. PAU was
an attempt to port the PAS to a component-centric implementation, but
Stephan Richter wrote:
Hi everyone,
I just tried to create a catalog for an annotation and noticed that it does
not get filled. Digging around in the zope.annotation package, I noticed that
the zope.annotation package does not send out any object events. This
sucks. ;-)
Thus I propose:
-
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Tuesday 15 July 2008, Fred Drake wrote:
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 12:30 PM, Stephan Richter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thus I propose:
- Add ObjectCreatedEvent event notification to zope.annotation factory
call.
By this, I presume you mean the stuff in
I've been working on a new web framework named (provisionally) repoze.bfg.
The relevant README is here: http://svn.repoze.org/repoze.bfg/trunk/README.txt
It is essentially a Zope lite. It is Zope-ish in that:
- it uses a lot of Zope libraries and concepts (interfaces, some CA constructs,
On Wednesday 16 July 2008, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
this came out of the ST project, where we constantly repeated this sort
of code.
Not that it matters much, but I think it was Martijn Faassen who wrote it.
... who worked on ST at the time and saw this pattern there.
Regards,
On Wednesday 16 July 2008, Fred Drake wrote:
I suspect this is what you mean, though we've been mostly referring to
the added event.
Right.
Regards,
Stephan
--
Stephan Richter
Web Software Design, Development and Training
Google me. Zope Stephan Richter
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 10:45 AM, Stephan Richter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But I agree. The system supports simple type and that is one of the use cases.
While I originally wanted to add at least 2 of the events to the IAnnotations
adapter itself, I agree with you that the overhead penalty
Previously Stephan Richter wrote:
On Wednesday 16 July 2008, Fred Drake wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 10:26 AM, Stephan Richter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree. I realized only later that those events are defined in the
zope.app.container package. In this case I would just create
Hi Stephan
Betreff: Re: [Zope-dev] Re: No events in zope.annotation
[...]
I do not think that I have a single annotation that is a
simple type.
I cannot even think of a quick example where any of the Zope 3 core
packages have/use simple type annotations.
FWIW none of my code uses
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 11:33 AM, Roger Ineichen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Even worse, I store objects in the annotation wich are added to
a real IContainer as items somewhere else. This objects are created,
added etc. already in the other container and provide locations
from there.
Only the
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 10:41 AM, Juergen Kartnaller
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Log message for revision 88402:
added filePattern parameter for tal_strings to be able to not only parse
*.pt files.
This looks like a new feature, and as such warrants a version bump to 3.5.0.
Changed:
U
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Fred Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't see any need for a way to suppress them, since they shouldn't
trigger any subscribers for the normal containment events.
Based on some discussion here, I realize that my position may not be
terribly clear. Just to
Hey Benji,
Seems that it breaks coverage...
The result looks like coverage is started after importing the modules
to test. That means declarations do not seem to 'run', but just the code
inbetween them.
Checked with 3.5.1, it looks fine.
--
Best regards,
Adam GROSZER
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 1:19 PM, Adam GROSZER [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey Benji,
Seems that it breaks coverage...
In what way is coverage broken? With or without -j? Can you formulate
a test that demonstrates the breakage?
The result looks like coverage is started after importing the
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 20:22, Stephan Richter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 16 July 2008, Lennart Regebro wrote:
Log message for revision 88417:
Changed the API. It's unwieldy as it is, so better have separate method
for plurals.
It looks to me as if you only support one
On Wednesday 16 July 2008, Lennart Regebro wrote:
While talking about this, what would a ZPT implementation of this best
look like? An i18n:count statement that takes expressions?
p i18n:translate= i18n:count=view/file_countThere are %d files/p
Or?
Good question! The ZPT above is not
Hi there,
we maintain some modules that should work against different versions of
dependent module. E.g. my z3c.sqlalchemy module should work with
Sqlalchemy 0.3.X and zope.interface 3.0.X
or
SQLAlchemy =0.4.X and zope.interface=3.3.0
The codebase right works with both combinations. I am not
Hello Benji,
Sorry, now being specific with the facts (all other activities only
tomorrow (I'll check the revisions))
Results are generated by:
python bootstrap.py
bin/buildout
bin/coverage-test
bin/coverage-report
on the source of:
I've added a tag for the 3.5.4 bugfix release of zope.app.container.
Could someone please add me on the owners list on pypi so that I can upload it?
thanks,
Christophe
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Andreas Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
we maintain some modules that should work against different versions of
dependent module. E.g. my z3c.sqlalchemy module should work with
Sqlalchemy 0.3.X and zope.interface 3.0.X
or
SQLAlchemy =0.4.X and
Hi.
It's awesome to see some progress on this. You are aware of the Gettext
manual at
http://www.gnu.org/software/gettext/manual/gettext.html#Plural-forms right?
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Wednesday 16 July 2008, Lennart Regebro wrote:
While talking about this, what would a ZPT
Sorry.
There's some garbage in my last message. Disregard the following bits.
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
br i18n:attributes=
You selected
span tal:content=num i18n:name=num5/span
out of
span tal:content=total i18n:name=total10/span
files.
/p
Can someone think about an example involving
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 20:55, Stephan Richter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good question! The ZPT above is not correct; once we write a correct one, it
becomes more obvious:
p i18n:translate=There are span tal:content=view/num i18n:name=num
i18n:count=view/num10/span files./p
Ah, well, right.
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 22:36, Hanno Schlichting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
p i18n:translate=
You have to pay
span tal:content=view/formatted_amount i18n:name=amount
i18n:count=view/amount6 dollars/span.
/p
In this case the underlying value is a simple integer, but the actual
presentation
Lennart Regebro wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 22:36, Hanno Schlichting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
p i18n:translate=
You have to pay
span tal:content=view/formatted_amount i18n:name=amount
i18n:count=view/amount6 dollars/span.
/p
In this case the underlying value is a simple integer, but the
- Christophe Combelles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've added a tag for the 3.5.4 bugfix release of zope.app.container.
Could someone please add me on the owners list on pypi so that I can
upload it?
Your PyPI ID ?
--
Baiju M
___
Zope-Dev
43 matches
Mail list logo
