On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 10:07 PM, Jim Fulton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- If a file is documentation and a test, make sure it is good
documentation. In that case, documentation comes first. Don't add so many
tests that it ruins the documentation.
- Test edge cases in separate tests. These
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 04:07:12PM -0400, Jim Fulton wrote:
- If a file is documentation and a test, make sure it is good
documentation. In that case, documentation comes first. Don't add so
many tests that it ruins the documentation.
- Test edge cases in separate tests. These are
Lennart Regebro wrote:
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 10:07 PM, Jim Fulton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- If a file is documentation and a test, make sure it is good
documentation. In that case, documentation comes first. Don't add so many
tests that it ruins the documentation.
- Test edge cases in
After a fair amount of work figuring out Sphinx, I modified the
default css and template to produce something that could be more or
less seemlessly integrated into the new zope.org. Anyhow, I encourage
everyone to take a look at http://docs.carduner.net/z3c.form/ for a
working example. This
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Thu Apr 24 11:00:00 2008 UTC to Fri Apr 25 11:00:00 2008 UTC.
There were 5 messages: 5 from Zope Tests.
Tests passed OK
---
Subject: OK : Zope-2.8 Python-2.3.6 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Thu Apr 24 21:03:42 EDT 2008
URL:
Hi All,
I bumped into hurry.workflow yesterday and was reminded again that we
often have the need to register components against string labels.
As an example, I want to register a subscriber to a particular workflow
transition.
Now, the hurry.workflow examples I've seen seem to revolve around
Hi Paul. Good work. Personally, I am interested in switching out the
jinja templates for zpt or ctal since am not that keen about mixing
template languages for myself. It looks like the more recent changes to
sphinx should accommodate this with the template_bridge but have yet to
investigate
On Apr 25, 2008, at 1:59 AM, Lennart Regebro wrote:
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 10:07 PM, Jim Fulton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- If a file is documentation and a test, make sure it is good
documentation. In that case, documentation comes first. Don't add
so many
tests that it ruins the
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 3:07 PM, Jim Fulton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 24, 2008, at 1:12 AM, Christian Theune wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 04:47:59PM -0400, Jim Fulton wrote:
On Apr 23, 2008, at 4:47 PM, Marius Gedminas wrote:
...
The point of my message was
On Apr 25, 2008, at 10:20 AM, Kent Tenney wrote:
However, as Sphinx lowers the barrier to cross-referencing,
Sounds like I need to check that out. :)
they will become
important as link destinations from 'real' documentation.
Maaaybe. I like doctests for readability even if they aren't
On Friday 25 April 2008, Jim Fulton wrote:
However, as Sphinx lowers the barrier to cross-referencing,
Sounds like I need to check that out. :)
Paul just diud that work the last two days for z3c.form:
http://docs.carduner.net/z3c.form/
Regards,
Stephan
--
Stephan Richter
Web Software
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 9:39 AM, Jim Fulton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 25, 2008, at 10:20 AM, Kent Tenney wrote:
However, as Sphinx lowers the barrier to cross-referencing,
Sounds like I need to check that out. :)
they will become
important as link destinations from 'real'
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 10:11 AM, Kent Tenney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 9:39 AM, Jim Fulton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 25, 2008, at 10:20 AM, Kent Tenney wrote:
However, as Sphinx lowers the barrier to cross-referencing,
Sounds like I need to
On Apr 25, 2008, at 11:22 AM, Stephan Richter wrote:
- A variation is to have a narrative that doesn't try hard to be
documentation. The narrative can be convenient, up to a point, even
in a test. These should be clearly marked as not being
documentation.
Why is this not documentation?
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 02:03:53PM -0700, Timothy Selivanow wrote:
On Wed, 2008-04-23 at 22:38 +0300, Marius Gedminas wrote:
By the way, the usual way to run tests in the Zope-3-land is to use
bin/test rather than setup.py test. It uses a slightly different test
runner that uses a
What's the story with http://buildbot.zope.org ?
It looks like most of the slaves are either disconnected, or failing
to build at all, with errors like this:
e.g.
http://buildbot.zope.org/Zope3%20trunk%202.4%20Windows%202000%20zc-bbwin3/builds/704/svn/0
...
File
Hello Paul,
Theuni built a new one:
http://zopebuildbot.whq.gocept.com/
But it's down again...
Friday, April 25, 2008, 6:46:32 PM, you wrote:
PW What's the story with http://buildbot.zope.org ?
PW It looks like most of the slaves are either disconnected, or failing
PW to build at all, with
Tres Seaver wrote:
I'd like to rip out the old Interface module from the 2.11 branch and
the trunk, along with all the useless decoys which import it. THere is
no *good* BBB reason to keep them around: anybody still depending on
them in A.G. 2008 needs to switch over, anyway.
Objections?
+1 for trunk
-1 for 2.11 branch
Stefan
On 25. Apr 2008, at 20:49, Tres Seaver wrote:
I'd like to rip out the old Interface module from the 2.11 branch and
the trunk, along with all the useless decoys which import it.
--
Anything that happens, happens. --Douglas Adams
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 12:46 PM, Paul Winkler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's the story with http://buildbot.zope.org ?
It's unloved. Do you have any spare love?
--
Benji York
Senior Software Engineer
Zope Corporation
___
Zope-Dev maillist -
Hi,
zope/app/locales/TRANSLATE.txt says:
...
After that, you need to merge those changes to all existing
translations. You can do that by executing the ``i18nmergeall.py``
script from the ``utilities`` directory of your Zope 3 checkout:
$ python utilities/i18nmergeall.py -l
I've got a fix, with tests, for https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope2/+bug/27
checked in at Zope/branches/slinkp-datetime-27
If nobody objects in the next few days, I'd like to merge this to
trunk, and the 2.11, 2.10, and 2.9 branches.
--
http://www.slinkp.com
Previously Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'd like to rip out the old Interface module from the 2.11 branch and
the trunk, along with all the useless decoys which import it. THere is
no *good* BBB reason to keep them around: anybody still depending on
--On 25. April 2008 21:39:14 +0200 Stefan H. Holek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
+1 for trunk
-1 for 2.11 branch
Same vote from my side. The 2.11 branch is in beta state and for this
reason no major changes for 2.11 please.
Andreas
pgphPwqNpCYq2.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--On 25. April 2008 17:07:29 -0400 Paul Winkler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've got a fix, with tests, for
https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope2/+bug/27 checked in at
Zope/branches/slinkp-datetime-27
If nobody objects in the next few days, I'd like to merge this to
trunk, and the 2.11,
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 5:48 AM, David Pratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Paul. Good work. Personally, I am interested in switching out the jinja
templates for zpt or ctal since am not that keen about mixing template
languages for myself. It looks like the more recent changes to sphinx should
26 matches
Mail list logo
