FWIW, Martijn is correct. Python 2.4 does not like values 2**31-1
for list indexes, slices, e.a. even on 64 bit systems. I have disabled
the respective test runs.
Stefan
On 01.11.2009, at 14:43, Martijn Pieters wrote:
2009/10/31 Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com:
I can't reproduce this
On 10/19/2009 11:57 AM, Jonathan Ballet wrote:
Hello there,
as I mentioned by Sebastien, the patch has been commited into the
sdouche-shuffle branch. It now has tests and a bit of documentation
too.
Regarding CLI arguments, I'm not sure this could be changed like
Christian proposed. If
Hello Christian,
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 11:07 AM, Christian Theune c...@gocept.com wrote:
[...] btw: do you log the seed if
you generated one?)
Yep, the seed is displayed at the end of tests, so that it can be
reused to reproduce a failing test.
$ ./bin/test --shuffle -cvvv
Running
Thomas Lotze wrote:
Thomas Lotze wrote:
While writing tests for the zope.site.hooks module I'm moving to
zope.component, I notice that the module calls getSiteManager() on an site
object. Such an object isn't technically required to implement an
interface that declares that method, but
I also proposed a Grok tutorial, but I've had no word about its
acceptance or declination. My zope talk where I would discuss Grok,
buildout and zope.component was rejected.
Carlos de la Guardia
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Chris McDonough chr...@plope.com wrote:
So were any Zope
On Nov 3, 2009, at 4:48 PM, Chris McDonough wrote:
Gary Poster wrote:
...
It is an advocacy piece only in the sense that we are saying that,
by-and-large, we like what the packages give us, but it is more
challenging than that. It's an interesting pairing to Jeff Shell's
invited
I had a rethinking interfaces talk accepted. It's about the
positives and negatives of zope.interface and zope.component, driven
primarily from the perspective and experience of the Launchpad team,
and myself in particular; and about changes that might be made or
differences we are
So were any Zope talks/tutorials accepted?
FWIW, Tres had a BFG talk accepted, and Carlos had a BFG talk and a BFG
tutorial accepted. I proposed a talk about profiling that didn't make it.
The TG guys had one talk accepted.
Not sure about Pylons.
I assume Django had a bunch, but I don't know
Chris McDonough wrote:
So were any Zope talks/tutorials accepted?
I have no idea, besides BFG, which is at the very least Zope related. :)
Lennart?
Regards,
Martijn
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
2009/11/3 Gary Poster gary.pos...@gmail.com:
I had a rethinking interfaces talk accepted. It's about the
positives and negatives of zope.interface and zope.component, driven
primarily from the perspective and experience of the Launchpad team,
and myself in particular; and about changes that
On Nov 3, 2009, at 3:28 PM, Lennart Regebro wrote:
2009/11/3 Gary Poster gary.pos...@gmail.com:
I had a rethinking interfaces talk accepted. It's about the
positives and negatives of zope.interface and zope.component, driven
primarily from the perspective and experience of the Launchpad
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Thomas Lotze wrote:
I wonder: should we start requiring that the object passed to setSite()
implement (or even be adaptable to) IPossibleSite?
I think the simplest way forward would be not to change the semantics as
part of this step.
Agreed.
--
Thomas
12 matches
Mail list logo
