Hi,
Todays "emerge -vauDN world" failed with gnupg not being emerged. The
reason seems to be that I am emerging a new kernel too. This new kernel
has obviously not been configured/build yet which makes gnupg unable to
find .config in "/usr/src/linux/". I expect this problem
On Wednesday, 18 December 2019 07:33:51 GMT Andrew Udvare wrote:
> > On Dec 17, 2019, at 20:51, Philip Webb wrote:
> >
> > When encrypting a file, I was told :
> > root:552 root> gpg -c
> > gpg: WARNING: unsafe ownership on homedir '/home/purslow/.gnupg&
191218 Mick wrote:
> On Wednesday, 18 December 2019 07:33:51 GMT Andrew Udvare wrote:
>> On Dec 17, 2019, at 20:51, Philip Webb wrote:
>>> When encrypting a file, I was told :
>>> root:552 root> gpg -c
>>> gpg: WARNING: unsafe ownership on homedir
Hello,
I had the same error. Quoting from
http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-announce/2007q3/000259.html :
"GnuPG-2 has a different architecture than GnuPG-1 (e.g. 1.4.6) in that
it splits up functionality into several modules. However, both
versions may be installed alongside withou
Today, I executed the following command to update my system
emerge -auDN world
What happened is that gnupg seemed to be downgraded to 1.4.7-r1 version.
I know gnupg-2.0.7 is stable in the current portage, so I am curious
about this downgrade of gnupg. After searching this thread
On 9/19/06, Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hmm, why do I have two gnupg's, can I umerge the earliest of them?
=
[I--] [ ] app-crypt/gnupg-1.4.5 (0)
[I--] [ ] app-crypt/gnupg-1.9.20-r3 (1.9)
=
On Tuesday 19 September 2006 23:28, ellotheth rimmwen wrote:
> On 9/19/06, Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hmm, why do I have two gnupg's, can I umerge the earliest of them?
> > =
> > [I--] [ ] app-crypt/gnupg-1.
Hi,
I had this and masked v2. Actually, this is IMO not a bug because you
can't slot two gnupg installations. You must chose between 1.x stable
lightweight and 2.x branch. Don't hesitate to take a look at the gnupg
website ;)
Sincerely,
Jil
Tim a écrit :
Michael Sullivan wrot
le versions within a single package slot have been
> !!! pulled into the dependency graph:
>
> app-crypt/gnupg:0
>
> ('ebuild', '/', 'app-crypt/gnupg-1.4.7-r1', 'merge') pulled in by
> ('installed', '/', 'mail-cli
On Tuesday 02 January 2007 10:32, Andrew Gaydenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
about 'Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] gnupg upgraded, problems arised':
> I have masked 2.x version as need to work.
> I'm not pgp guru and wil wait for other's opinions.
I didn't find a bug
On 3/10/07, John covici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[ebuild U ] app-crypt/gnupg-1.9.21 [1.9.20-r3] USE="X ldap nls
-gpg2-experimental (-selinux) -smartcard (-caps%)" 1,858 kB
[blocks B ] app-crypt/gnupg (is blocking
app-crypt/gnupg-1.9.20-r3)
It seems that the installed
I have a problem with gnupg updating:
# emerge -upvDN world
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating world dependencies... done!
[ebuild U ] app-crypt/gnupg-2.0.7 [1.4.7-r1] USE="-bzip2 -doc% -ldap -nls
-openct% -pcsc-lite% (-selinux) -smartcard (-bindist%) (
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Claudio Roberto França Pereira
wrote:
> Try emerge -pv gnupg.
> Maybe the devs had masked the bzip2 use flag for some reason.
>
> Sorry, I'm not in Gentoo right now to assist you more.
Doesn't look like it, at least to my limited ability t
On Sunday 17 June 2007 17:35:44 Aleksey Kunitskiy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Today I tried to emerge kde-3.5.7 and I had one blocked package:
> [blocks B ] <=app-crypt/gnupg-2.0.1 (is blocking app-crypt/gnupg-2.0.4)
>
> How can I list packages that depend on <=app-crypt/gnupg-2.
Solution: emerge -C gnupg && emerge gnupg
-Kristian
-Original Message-
From: John covici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 10:25:45 -0500
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-user] package seems to block itself
>Hi. I seem to have a strange
I to do an emerge -uD ? because I do only emerge --update ?
> >>
> >
> > I don't think that's the problem. To my knowledge the -D means update
> > related packages (it means "deep").
>
> Half way right: in this case, gnupg-1.4.6 *is* a rela
More news:
I successfully got GnuPG 1.9 installed, and then a new problem arose.
Configuration.
I went to http://kmail.kde.org/kmail-pgpmime-howto.html#gnupg and followed the
instructions to the best of my ability, and yet I still get this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/.gnupg $ eval "$(gpg-
ans update
related packages (it means "deep").
Half way right: in this case, gnupg-1.4.6 *is* a related package. If you
have gnupg in world, and tell portage to --update world, it will update
the highest slot version of gnupg, in this case 1.9. Only when you say
--deep, it will go for
Hi. I seem to have a strange situation where a package block itself
or that is the way it seems.
If I try to do emerge gnupg this is what I get.
emerge gnupg
>>> cfg-update-1.8.0-r3 : No new packages have been emerged, checksum
>index OK...
These are the packages that would be merg
on Saturday 03/10/2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED]([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote
> Solution: emerge -C gnupg && emerge gnupg
>
> -Kristian
That worked -- thanks guys. Thanks for all your help on the inns and
outs of gentoo -- takes some getting used to, but its fine once you
do.
&g
Il 22/08/24 20:36, Eli Schwartz ha scritto:
On 8/22/24 11:38 AM, ralfconn wrote:
Il 22/08/24 06:50, Eli Schwartz ha scritto:
emerging portage itself, will require gnupg as a dependency, and in
turn that means app-crypt/pinentry If pinentry is built with
USE=keyring, it requires app-crypt
That's the Problem
no bzip2 masked
emerge -pv gnupg
[ebuild R ] app-crypt/gnupg-2.0.17 USE="adns bzip2 ldap nls
static -caps -doc -openct -pcsc-lite (-selinux) -smartcard" 0 kB
On 2011-12-03 15:32,
rebuild -X -v -p
> [snip...]
>
> Checking dynamic linking consistency...
> broken /usr/lib/libaprutil-0.so.0.9.12 (requires libexpat.so.0)
> broken /usr/libexec/gnupg/gpgkeys_curl (requires libcurl.so.3)
> broken /usr/libexec/gnupg/gpgkeys_hkp (requires libcurl.so.3)
> done.
> (/roo
dependency graph:
app-crypt/gnupg:0
('ebuild', '/', 'app-crypt/gnupg-1.4.7-r1', 'merge') pulled in by
('installed', '/', 'mail-client/squirrelmail-1.4.10a-r2', 'nomerge')
('ebuild', '/', '
(requires libexpat.so.0)
broken /usr/libexec/gnupg/gpgkeys_curl (requires libcurl.so.3)
broken /usr/libexec/gnupg/gpgkeys_hkp (requires libcurl.so.3)
done.
(/root/.revdep-rebuild.3_rebuild)
Assigning files to packages...
/usr/lib/libaprutil-0.so.0.9.12 -> dev-libs/apr-util
/
I just noticed this:
==
$ eval "$(gpg-agent --daemon)"
can't connect to `/home/michael/.gnupg/log-socket': Connection refused
==
Is this meant to happen? Why can't it connect t
On Tuesday 25 April 2006 08:16 am, Daniel da Veiga wrote:
> On 4/25/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > More news:
> >
> > I successfully got GnuPG 1.9 installed, and then a new problem arose.
> > Configuration.
> >
> > I went to
On 4/25/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> More news:
>
> I successfully got GnuPG 1.9 installed, and then a new problem arose.
> Configuration.
>
> I went to http://kmail.kde.org/kmail-pgpmime-howto.html#gnupg and followed the
> instructions to the be
This is what I get when I try to launch the gpg-agent from a terminal:
==
$ eval "$(gpg-agent --daemon)"
can't connect to `/home/michael/.gnupg/log-socket': Connection refused
==
No idea why. Ca
gnupg 1.9.20-r3 and 1.4.6 are the latest stable GnuPG versions for x86. And
they are perfectly available for me (I have both installed and am not using
~x86).
-Kristian Poul Herkild
-Original Message-
From: "Nelson, David (ED, PAR&D)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu,
rder:
>
> Calculating dependencies ...done!
> [ebuild R ] app-crypt/gpgme-1.0.2 814 kB
>
> Total size of downloads: 814 kB
>
>
> Is it me or there's something wrong here ?
> Thank you.
Hi,
it's neither you nor is there something wrong. GnuPG 1.4.1 is
:
>
> Calculating world dependencies |
> !!! Multiple versions within a single package slot have been
> !!! pulled into the dependency graph:
>
> app-crypt/gnupg:0
>
> ('ebuild', '/', 'app-crypt/gnupg-1.4.7-r1', 'merge') pulled in by
&
On 1/4/07, qfpvajdy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I'm surprised that after several "emerge sync" and "emerge --update world"
operations since Wed Dec 6 2006, Gentoo has still not upgraded to GnuPG version 1.4.6.
It's always helpful if you tell us your
On Sunday 23 April 2006 11:36, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> through KGPG. The problem is that the GnuPG agent in the x86 area is
> version 1.4.2.2, yet KMail demands verison 1.9
>
The main problem is that gpg-agent has been "Package Masked" in favour of
gnupg-1.9.20-r1. So KMai
s/xinit-1.0.5-r1 [1.0.4] USE="-hal% -pam%"
> [ebuild N] app-crypt/pinentry-0.7.3 USE="ncurses -caps -gtk -qt3"
> [ebuild U ] app-crypt/gnupg-2.0.7 [1.4.7-r1] USE="-doc% -openct%
> -pcsc-lite%"
> [blocks B ] <=app-crypt/gnupg-2.0.1 (is blocking app
On Sonntag 15 November 2009, Mark Knecht wrote:
> app-crypt/-MERGING-gnupg
>
remove that from world file and the directory from /var/db/pkg and then re-
emerge gnupg.
> On Dec 17, 2019, at 20:51, Philip Webb wrote:
>
> When encrypting a file, I was told :
>
> root:552 root> gpg -c
> gpg: WARNING: unsafe ownership on homedir '/home/purslow/.gnupg'
>
> The file is owned by my user, ie : .
> This seems to be th
On Saturday 26 Nov 2011 23:50:24 Florian Philipp wrote:
> Am 27.11.2011 00:03, schrieb Samuraiii:
> > Hello fellow Gentoonians,
> >
> > I have problem with Gnupg 2 and compress preference on keys.
> >
> > When I recieve email which is for recipirnt with set
Sergey Kobzar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Could you please tell me what is wrong and how can I fix this?
What I did was
emerge --unmerge gnupg
and then re-ran emerge -auDvN world and gnupg-2.0.7 was installed
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Fri February 10 2006 02:59, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> I just checked the .ebuild in my portage tree does not list gentoo-sources
> as direct dependency of gunpg-1.4.2.r3. Please do a emerge -pvt
> =app-crypt/gnupg-1.4.2-r3 and give us the output (you might have to unmask
)
* broken /usr/bin/gpgsm (requires libksba.so.8)
[ 16% ] * broken /usr/bin/kbxutil (requires libksba.so.8)
[ 100% ]
* Generated new 3_broken.rr
* Assigning files to packages
* /usr/bin/gpg-agent -> app-crypt/-MERGING-gnupg
* /usr/bin/gpg-connect-agent -> app-crypt/-MERGING-gnupg
*
On 25/04/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> More news:
>
> I successfully got GnuPG 1.9 installed, and then a new problem arose.
> Configuration.
>
> I went to http://kmail.kde.org/kmail-pgpmime-howto.html#gnupg and followed the
> instructions to the be
On 04/05/2017 10:22 PM, Miroslav Rovis wrote:
On 170405-18:01-0400, Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
Hello,
After a recent update I'm getting this error whenever I try to encrypt
or decrypt using gnupg. Here's error:
gpg: selftest for CTR failed - see syslog for details
gpg: O j
On Sat, 2006-02-11 at 03:52 -0500, Ron Bickers wrote:
> On Fri February 10 2006 02:59, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
>
> > I just checked the .ebuild in my portage tree does not list gentoo-sources
> > as direct dependency of gunpg-1.4.2.r3. Please do a emerge -pvt
> > =
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 8:38 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
> Hi,
> How do I properly clean up this problem with emerge?
>
> Thanks,
> Mark
>
Seems that I was able to do
emerge gnupg
emerge -C gnupg
emerge --depclean
and now revdep-rebuild -ip is clean.
Cheers,
Mark
Ow Mun Heng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You;re Right. Why is that?
> Does anyone knows?
The updated rule sets fetched by sa-update are signed, so sa-update
calls gnupg to validate them. So the spamassassin ebuild has a hard
dependency on gnupg.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Sat, 15 Dec 2007 18:55:43 -0500, Walter Dnes wrote:
> - why didn't portage replace the old version itself? That's generally
> part of the update process.
GnuPG is slotted, so 1.* and 2.* can be installed simultaneously.
> - once I manually unmerged gnupg, what bri
On Friday 29 December 2006 04:20, Andrew Gaydenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
about '[gentoo-user] [OT] gnupg upgraded, problems arised':
> After yesterday syncing (~amd64) gnupg package was upgraded (and
> de-slotted). Now - via KMail, KGpg, gpg CLI - my long-used password
&g
I have masked 2.x version as need to work.
I'm not pgp guru and wil wait for other's opinions.
=== On Tuesday 02 January 2007 19:10, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: ===
On Friday 29 December 2006 04:20, Andrew Gaydenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
about '[gentoo-user
postgres% -qmail -sqlite% -tools" 952 kB
> > [ebuild N] app-crypt/gnupg-1.9.20-r3 USE="nls -X -caps
> > -gpg2-experimental -ldap -smartcard" 1,767 kB
> > [ebuild N] app-crypt/gnupg-1.4.2.2 USE="bzip2 nls readline zlib -X
> > -caps -cu
On 170405-18:01-0400, Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> Hello,
>
> After a recent update I'm getting this error whenever I try to encrypt
> or decrypt using gnupg. Here's error:
>
> > gpg: selftest for CTR failed - see syslog for details
> > gpg: O
Holly Bostick wrote:
> but everybody could just read the man page and work it out for
> themselves, of course :) .
Alternatively, one could read Gentoo's GnuPG documentation[1] or the
GnuPG Handbook[2]. :-)
[1] http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gnupg-user.xml
[2] http://www.gn
On 04/05/2017 10:22 PM, Miroslav Rovis wrote:
On 170405-18:01-0400, Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
Hello,
After a recent update I'm getting this error whenever I try to encrypt
or decrypt using gnupg. Here's error:
gpg: selftest for CTR failed - see syslog for details
gpg: O j
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
More news:
I successfully got GnuPG 1.9 installed, and then a new problem arose.
Configuration.
I went to http://kmail.kde.org/kmail-pgpmime-howto.html#gnupg and followed the
instructions to the best of my ability, and yet I still get this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED
problem
If you want to see emerge --info gnupg follow my bug
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=390163
S
On 2011-12-06 01:51, Claudio Roberto França Pereira wrote:
Are you sure you've re-emerged the package after adding the
Hi,
Today I tried to emerge kde-3.5.7 and I had one blocked package:
[blocks B ] <=app-crypt/gnupg-2.0.1 (is blocking app-crypt/gnupg-2.0.4)
How can I list packages that depend on <=app-crypt/gnupg-2.0.1 ?
thanks for any suggestions
--
best regards,
Aleksey V. Kunitskiy
my public G
On Fri, 21 Mar 2008 16:18:31 +0100, Dan Johansson wrote:
> [ebuild N] mail-mta/courier-0.58.0 USE="crypt fam ldap nls
> nowebadmin nowebmail -fax -ipv6 -mailwrapper -mysql -norewrite -pam
> -postgres -spell" 6,957 kB [1]
> [ebuild N] app-crypt/gnupg-2.0.7-r1
pdate I'm getting this error whenever I try to encrypt
> > >>
> > >> or decrypt using gnupg. Here's error:
> > >>> gpg: selftest for CTR failed - see syslog for details
> > >>> gpg: O j: ... this is a bug (seskey.c:61:make_ses
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Must... resist... posting... the... kit...
- --
A computer scientist is someone who, when told "go to hell", considers
the "go to" harmful rather than the destination.
GnuPG Key: 0xB14661D9
GnuPG FP: DE08 57AE A1AD 620C 02AA
On Thursday 06 Apr 2017 11:10:56 Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> On 04/05/2017 10:22 PM, Miroslav Rovis wrote:
> > On 170405-18:01-0400, Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> After a recent update I'm getting this error whenever I try to encrypt
.3 [1.40.2]
[ebuild U ] sys-fs/e2fsprogs-1.40.3 [1.40.2]
[ebuild U ] net-firewall/iptables-1.3.8-r2 [1.3.8-r1]
[ebuild U ] x11-apps/xinit-1.0.5-r1 [1.0.4] USE="-hal% -pam%"
[ebuild N] app-crypt/pinentry-0.7.3 USE="ncurses -caps -gtk -qt3"
[ebuild U ] app-crypt/gn
ot; 6,957 kB [1]
> > [ebuild N] app-crypt/gnupg-2.0.7-r1 USE="bzip2
> > nls -doc -ldap -openct -pcsc-lite (-selinux) -smartcard" 3,526 kB
> > [ebuild N] mail-mta/ssmtp-2.61-r2 USE="ssl -ipv6 -mailwrapper
> > -md5sum" 53 kB
> > [
Hi all,
I am using mutt and gnupg for my mail and I do not understand something:
when I sign and send an email, my gpg signature appears as an attached
"noname" file while friends have an attached "signature.asc" file. How
do you do to change this not so important issue?
://putraware.ini.hu
GnuPG Public Key ID: 0x0CE0A57
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFCdqhTMkyacQzgalcRAjYeAJ9RYx+OMan2a1rRrftEkJT+MtD4NACgqmRn
1xrF3RwpOo1iuJbTWKfR7mA=
=2tqD
-END PGP SIGNATURE
to verify the signature
OpenPGP is selected in "Crypto Backends" with default keyserver
http://pgp.mit.edu
Automatically import keys and certificates is also selected.
gpg-agent is running, with the following config (gpg.conf):
> grep -v '^#' ~/.gnupg/gpg.conf | uniq
>
On 04/06/2017 11:10 AM, Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
On 04/05/2017 10:22 PM, Miroslav Rovis wrote:
On 170405-18:01-0400, Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
Hello,
After a recent update I'm getting this error whenever I try to encrypt
or decrypt using gnupg. Here's error:
gpg: selftest for
;t know if this will work when I have to rebuild gnupg. If not, perhaps
I can build it on a machine with sources and install the binary package.
> Well, I /sort of/ understand what is going on in the mind of the ebuild
> maintainer. The suid bit is only required for kernel versions less th
What user interface exist for gnupg for XFCE4 ?
--
Joseph
root passwd?
- --
Maerlyn
maerlyn[AT]citromail[DOT]hu
http://putraware.ini.hu
GnuPG Public Key ID: 0x0CE0A57
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFCZRcVMkyacQzgalcRAo/0AJ9MloL/37Ks7fpXoXvl0IrY8rIA/AC
On 10/06/06, gentuxx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My understanding is that these are different key types. S/MIME is
typically used for PKI type certificates, not GnuPG certificates. You
would need a DoD or Verisign (or some other publicly recognized CA)
certificate to use S/MIME. Depend
On Sunday 11 June 2006 12:23, Mick wrote:
> Thanks gentuxx. Would you know what missing backend kmail is
> complaining about? I am using gpg-agent (which is now part of gnupg)
> - can't his handle S/MIME certificates?
Which versions of gnupg and kmail do you use? Did you look
ference of key is impossible to set wrongly - I did
this on in time when I was on Ubuntu.)
I just cant understand why is bzip2 use ignored by Gnupg - its in
make.conf, by emerge --info is accepted for Gnupg but gpg
--version is not showing this compress prefernce.
impossible to set wrongly - I
did this on in time when I was on Ubuntu.)
>
> I just cant understand why is bzip2 use ignored by Gnupg -
its in make.conf, by emerge --info is accepted for Gnupg but gpg
--version is not showing this compress prefer
John J. Foster wrote:
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 12:41:51PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What options are out there?
My personal favorite is
app-crypt/gnupg
Aye, I keep website user info and passwords in text files with the
contents encrypted with GNUPG. Each website gets its own text
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 10:08:08PM +0100, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> Hey fellows,
>
> apparently, gnupg 2.1 does not recognise my passphrase anymore if I enter it
> in mutt’s terminal: I compose a signed mail in mutt and send it off. Thus I
> am asked for the passphrase first on t
I've been trying to find why I am unable to use GnuPG-agent to sign my
messages in KMail, and rather have to type in a password in all the time
through KGPG. The problem is that the GnuPG agent in the x86 area is version
1.4.2.2, yet KMail demands verison 1.9
I don't think it wise
Hi,
I did my normal sync and then got a list of packages to upgrade. It
fails on app-crypt/gnupg-1.9.94 with the following:
> checking if gcc supports -Wno-pointer-sign... yes
> configure:
> ***
> *** You need libgpg-error to build this program.
> ** This library is for examp
Hi all
yesterday I emerged the nvidia-drivers. All went well.
Then I ran 'emerge -NDpvu world' (I set nvidia flag in make.conf) and
found out to have 2 versions of qt (3.3.8-r3 and 4.3.0-r2) and 2
versions og gnupg (1.4.7-r1 and 1.9.21).
So I unmerged gnupg-1.4.7-r1 and ran 'emer
On Sunday 17 June 2007 18:46, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
> Packages that depend on <=app-crypt/gnupg-2.0.1 aren't the issue. The fact
> that you have <=app-crypt/gnupg-2.0.1 installed is the issue.
>
> # emerge --unmerge -va \<=app-crypt/gnupg-2.0.1
Thanks
Now I have an
;> Have you tried connecting to a different keyserver?
>
> Yep, I did. Also tried it manually via shell (gnupg-commandline).
>
> Same error:
>
> : can't connect to `subkeys.pgp.net': host not found
> gpgkeys: HTTP fetch error 7: couldn't connect: Not found
H
removed USE-flag "static", rebuilt gnupg, restarted gpg-agent and used
keyserver "pgp.mit.edu".
Works now.
Thanks, Stefan
Hello fellow Gentoonians,
I have problem with Gnupg 2 and compress preference on keys.
When I recieve email which is for recipirnt with set compress preference
to BZIP2 Thunderbird (with enigmail) fails to decrypt it due this:
gpg command line and output:
/usr/bin/gpg2
gpg: invalid item `BZIP2
Am 27.11.2011 00:03, schrieb Samuraiii:
> Hello fellow Gentoonians,
>
> I have problem with Gnupg 2 and compress preference on keys.
>
> When I recieve email which is for recipirnt with set compress preference
> to BZIP2 Thunderbird (with enigmail) fails to decrypt it due this
) because of this problem
> If you want to see emerge --info gnupg follow my bug
>
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=390163
>
> S
>
There is also a GnuPG mailing list with some highly competent
participants. Maybe you should ask there. Maybe something about your
On 8/22/24 11:16 PM, ralfconn wrote:
> There it is, portage requires gnupg, which requires pinentry, blah blah
> up to keepassxc. So exactly as you explained in your first reply except
> that it happens even without USE=keyring.
> BTW looks like a circular dependency there: gcr->
l address to publish offensive content.
> After a while using a digital signature (GnuPG or x509) becomes a habit.
That's exactly the case. ;-)
>
> It doesn't really add that much overhead anyway (197 Bytes for gpg to 3.1k
> Bytes for s/mime).
That's what I thought. :
Hey fellows,
apparently, gnupg 2.1 does not recognise my passphrase anymore if I enter it
in mutt’s terminal: I compose a signed mail in mutt and send it off. Thus I
am asked for the passphrase first on the terminal (as it has always been),
and then a second time in a graphical pinentry window
Hi,
On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 10:57:37 +0200 Jean-Christophe Bach wrote:
> I have a very similar problem, at least concerning your 2nd point
> (duplicated keys). All my problems came when I updated gnupg from 1.x to
> 2.x. I tried to solve them by playing with different 2.x versions but
> w
On 23/04/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been trying to find why I am unable to use GnuPG-agent to sign my
> messages in KMail, and rather have to type in a password in all the time
> through KGPG. The problem is that the GnuPG agent in the x86 area
or when it will be back alive.
>
> Where can I look for instructions?
>
> m.
The overlay has reached it's EOL[1].
HTH
- -- Joe
[1] http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-641342.html
- --
A computer scientist is someone who, when told "go to hell", considers
the "
ded bugreport...)
>
> And the preference of key is impossible to set wrongly - I did this on in
time when I was on Ubuntu.)
>
> I just cant understand why is bzip2 use ignored by Gnupg - its in
make.conf, by emerge --info is accepted for Gnupg but gpg --version is not
showing this compress prefern
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Rösner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 04 January 2007 10:21
> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Important security update for GnuPG!
>
>
> qfpvajdy wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > [...a
t password with
> passwd after the chroot command, where the install guide told me to,
> it doesn't work when I try to log in. The other user I created works.
> Is there any way to recover my root passwd?
>
> - --
> Maerlyn
> maerlyn[AT]citromail[DOT]hu
> htt
r that.
>
> Regards, Paul
Thanks, it worked.
- --
Maerlyn
maerlyn[AT]citromail[DOT]hu
http://putraware.ini.hu
GnuPG Public Key ID: 0x0CE0A57
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFCd5+wMkyacQzgalcRAnV
Try emerge -pv gnupg.
Maybe the devs had masked the bzip2 use flag for some reason.
Sorry, I'm not in Gentoo right now to assist you more.
Are you sure you've re-emerged the package after adding the bzip2 use
flag? Run eix app-crypt/gnupg to confirm.
> -Original Message-
> From: Graham Murray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 04 January 2007 14:05
> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Important security update for GnuPG!
>
>
> "Nelson, David (ED, PAR&D)" <[EMAIL
> -Original Message-
> From: qfpvajdy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 04 January 2007 16:18
> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Important security update for GnuPG!
>
> This is strange, I just made a emerge sync and then a emerge
>
On Monday 24 April 2006 02:42 pm, Abhay Kedia wrote:
> On Sunday 23 April 2006 11:36, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > through KGPG. The problem is that the GnuPG agent in the x86 area is
> > version 1.4.2.2, yet KMail demands verison 1.9
>
> The main problem is that gpg-ag
Ow Mun Heng wrote:
> I cannot figure out why it's pulling it in as a dependency.
>
> [ebuild U ] mail-filter/spamassassin-3.1.3 [3.1.0] USE="berkdb ssl -doc
> -ipv6% -ldap% -minimal -mysql -postgres% -qmail -sqlite% -tools" 952 kB
> [ebuild N] app-cryp
1 - 100 of 2011 matches
Mail list logo
