So maybe the best thing is to just drop this out of the code?
And possibly lose support on a couple versions of 1.4?
Erwin
And possibly lose support on a couple versions of 1.4?
Erwin
- [GUMP@lsd]: xml-security/xml-security fa... Sam Ruby <[email protected]>
- [GUMP@lsd]: xml-security/xml-security fa... Sam Ruby <[email protected]>
- [GUMP@lsd]: xml-security/xml-security fa... Sam Ruby
- [GUMP@lsd]: xml-security/xml-security fa... Sam Ruby
- [GUMP@lsd]: xml-security/xml-security fa... Sam Ruby
- [GUMP@lsd]: xml-security/xml-security fa... Sam Ruby
- Re: [GUMP@lsd]: xml-security/xml-securit... Erwin van der Koogh
- Re: [GUMP@lsd]: xml-security/xml-se... Berin Lautenbach
- Re: [GUMP@lsd]: xml-security/xm... Erwin van der Koogh
- Re: [GUMP@lsd]: xml-securit... Berin Lautenbach
- Re: [GUMP@lsd]: xml-sec... Erwin van der Koogh
- Re: [GUMP@lsd]: xm... Berin Lautenbach
- [GUMP@lsd]: xml-security/xml-security fa... Sam Ruby
- [GUMP@lsd]: xml-security/xml-security fa... Sam Ruby
- [GUMP@lsd]: xml-security/xml-security fa... Sam Ruby
- [GUMP@lsd]: xml-security/xml-security fa... Sam Ruby
- [GUMP@lsd]: xml-security/xml-security fa... Sam Ruby
- [GUMP@lsd]: xml-security/xml-security fa... Sam Ruby
- [GUMP@lsd]: xml-security/xml-security fa... Sam Ruby
- [GUMP@lsd]: xml-security/xml-security fa... Sam Ruby
- [GUMP@lsd]: xml-security/xml-security fa... Sam Ruby
