Have you included a decryption Transform?: http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlenc-decrypt
--Sean
Andrej Konkow wrote:
Hi there,
I'm new to this kind of discussion but would like to respond to a message and point out another problem.
the solution you have described is not practicable from my point of view.
I have the following problem: We have evaluated the XML-Security package in combination with Apache Axis.
Everything is fine. Signing->Verifying, Encryption->Decryption.
But: When I make the following Signing->Encryption and on the other side Decryption->Verification then
the verification will fail, as the namespaces are no more included. There's no possibility for me to include the namespaces
in the way you described as we just handle the incoming messages. Currently I have no solution. Do you?
regards,
Andrej
------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Mikolaj Habryn <dichro-xml-security <at> rcpt.to>
Subject: Re: vanishing attribute namespace prefixes (resend)
Newsgroups: gmane.text.xml.security.devel
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 20:37:00 +1000
On Mon, 2004-09-13 at 18:42, Raul Benito wrote:rootElement.setAttributeNS("http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance","NS1:schemaLocation","urn:frog
rootElement.setAttributeNS(XMLNS_URI,"xmlns:NS1","http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";);http://xml.rcpt.to/mikolaj/default";);
I think your problems will be vanished.You are, of course, absolutely right.
For the benefit of any future searching of the list archives, the
sequence to get this right appears to be:
a = doc.createElement(localNamespace, prefix + ":" + tag);
a.setAttributeNS(xmlnsNamespace, "xmlns:" + prefix, localNamespace);
a.setAttributeNS(xmlnsNamespace, "xmlns:xsi", xmlschemaNamespace);
a.setAttributeNS(xmlschemaNamespace, "xsi:schemaLocation",
"localNamespace path-to-schema");
I hope to one day understand why it takes four lines to achieve a
construct that seems so fundamental.
m.
PS: ...and I see that my original post has now made it through. My
thanks to the moderators.
