> I was thinking about this during the day.  I'm going to add a method to
> allow the exclusive use to be turned off and that way it can be
> deactivated if it makes sense.  I've been wracking my brains to think
> about why I used it in the first place, and I know there was a really
> good reason but I just can't remember it :<.

Thanks, that's definitely sufficient for now. If you come up with a reason,
please let me know. I haven't been able to come up with any.

> On another note - I'm want to get this release done so I can start on
> tidying up a few things in the code - which is my personal focus for
> 1.4.  I know you were having a look at other things in encryption so
> just wanted to touch base before I moved it forward.

Yeah, thanks. I've done most of my stuff, and it wasn't too hard, though
some of the memory management is a little convoluted as far as which objects
are owned by what, but I don't have any specific suggestions to make that
are urgent.

If you want to cut a final RC, I can try and do a final round of source and
RPM builds and make sure it's clean. Red Hat is apparently going to put EL5
on top of gcc4.1, so I have to make sure things are ok.

Oh...I know the other thing...have you done any builds against a Xerces 3.0
snapshot?

-- Scott

Reply via email to