Hello,
I am using xml-security 1.4.0 (java) for my project. And I have found
several bugs of this library (Perhaps bugs of the
used third-party libraries):
1. In org.apache.xml.security.c14n.implementations.CanonicalizerBase and
org.apache.xml.security.c14n.implementations.UtfHelpper (How about if the
class name if changed to UtfHelper with ONE p?):
The line if ((c & 0x80) ==0) should be changed to if(c < 0x80), since the
most UTF-chars have 0 at bit 8.
2. There are always two text nodes with the value '\n' in succession within
<ds:SignedInfo> and <ds:X509IssuerSerial>. If we have signed some elements
and wish to add another signature with xpath as the tranform, then we get
the error that says no node can be found to a handle raised by xalan-J).
After the debug I found the responding codes as in following:
01 public SignedInfo(
02 Document doc, Element SignatureMethodElem, Element
CanonicalizationMethodElem)
03 throws XMLSecurityException {
04
05 super(doc);
06 this._constructionElement.appendChild(CanonicalizationMethodElem);
07 XMLUtils.addReturnToElement(this._constructionElement);
08 //Check this?
09 this.c14nMethod=CanonicalizationMethodElem;
10 this._constructionElement.appendChild(c14nMethod);
11 XMLUtils.addReturnToElement(this._constructionElement);
this._signatureAlgorithm = new SignatureAlgorithm(SignatureMethodElem,
null);
signatureMethod=this._signatureAlgorithm.getElement();
this._constructionElement.appendChild(signatureMethod);
XMLUtils.addReturnToElement(this._constructionElement);
}
Line 06 and 10 add the same element twice, hence the line 06 has no effect.
But the text-node with the value "\n" added at line 07 is remained there.
01 public XMLX509IssuerSerial(Document doc, String X509IssuerName,
02 BigInteger X509SerialNumber) {
03 super(doc);
04
05 XMLUtils.addReturnToElement(this._constructionElement);
06 this.addTextElement(X509IssuerName, Constants._TAG_X509ISSUERNAME);
07 XMLUtils.addReturnToElement(this._constructionElement);
08 this.addTextElement(X509SerialNumber.toString(),
Constants._TAG_X509SERIALNUMBER);
09 }
Line 07 should be removed, since '\n' is added in line 06.
Best regards,
Lijun Liao