Here are an example of signed document (HTH):
<searchRequestRequests messageID="searchBatch-0001"
offerID="/GIP-CPS/OC-SCL/ARGENT-PE-AUTH" protocolVersion="1.0">
<searchRequestRequest id="search-0002">
<criteria>
<property name="IdStructPE" value="CHU Puteaux"/>
</criteria>
</searchRequestRequest>
<Signature xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#";>
<SignedInfo xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#";>
<CanonicalizationMethod
Algorithm="http://www.w3.org/2001/10/xml-exc-c14n#"/>
<SignatureMethod Algorithm="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#rsa-sha1"/>
<Reference>
<Transforms>
<Transform
Algorithm="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#enveloped-signature"/>
</Transforms>
<DigestMethod Algorithm="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#sha1"/>
<DigestValue>l+iIpWpGpdxfvdW0zuCNmGw3H4U=</DigestValue>
</Reference>
</SignedInfo>
<SignatureValue>Ba4u4pWJ9qi4249tRV26JgxCqcwZn9XM71MHREYMIV4Ssdzb/Qix
DpySgXHm+RsHlddJgJFQXu6xMYUfsSUcCr5UdRW790RwJ4Jz2Fgli6NHC3e/LFMWcyaUNxmR4YLOpsymV732zPlLaQ8Ylqk+bt61yy20NnHUYx2Eu/ZCjL7dtjBI1G+8TyRk6mfi3sawKrAcUcemusZasCQbM1gEj2bH5Ic5AwtYvYIg==</SignatureValue>
<KeyInfo>
<X509Data>
<X509Certificate>
MIID8jCCA1ugAwIBAgIJAMvCN5kpn2MOMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBAUAMIGgMQswCQYDVQQGEwJGUjEOMAwG
A1UECBMFUGFyaXMxDjAMBgNVBAcTBVBhcmlzMQ8wDQYDVQQKEwZNaW5kZWYxDzANBgNVBAsTBkRpcmlza
TEkMCIGA1UEAxQbQUNfVGVjaG5pcXVlX0lHQ0dfTUlOREVGX0NEMSkwJwYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhphZG1pbi
5pZ2NnX2NkQGludHJhY2VkLm5ldDAeFw0wNjA1MDQxNjI1MzVaFw0wNzA1MDQxNjI1MzVaMH4xCzAJBgNV
BAYTAkZSMQ4wDAYDVQQIEwVQYXJpczEPMA0GA1UEChMGTWluZGVmMQ8wDQYDVQQLEwZEaXJpc2kxFDASBg
NVBAMTC0plYW4gUm91dGV0MScwJQYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhhqZWFuLnJvdXRldEBpbnRyYWNlZC5uZXQwggEi
MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4IBDwAwggEKAoIBAQDRU3sekHKKhLchUJhPSDGuNX/Rh6QUYej6m13/q6xGxe7
f/a+8+kKMSELJIOt/BTDJyeXC478pmeejzF9zo0FYO7L5uha0vUCocaVTcO0eSFhs29b/cciWePUJdKKzV
qIuz7UMI8OI3Yj8gcwTah8c/Ac96hEWhyXKbgQsaiudTPoGx2lzW/OH3CjgdA76uK6tiuP1S+nDeZ4hkl/8
T+KsLb3GqlHYScavzHLCasmrhRJqgFVBFYwsTx6Lw6csDakXHaM4N1btibaugE2qQsEGwLN8sZfx4Q0r9LCV
jn7sumiC+OerrQKzeJT7xkUxlWWysr5sK0OXrQV4gNifnPjFAgMBAAGjgdAwgc0wDAYDVR0TAQH/BAIwADA
sBglghkgBhvhCAQ0EHxYdT3BlblNTTCBHZW5lcmF0ZWQgQ2VydGlmaWNhdGUwHQYDVR0OBBYEFAtJTkuWO2
b6iWkjBo9Dug6pHD9aMB8GA1UdIwQYMBaAFCLUFszWl0Ql7s3XBHVMsRu91jDbMB0GA1UdJQQWMBQGCCsGA
QUFBwMCBggrBgEFBQcDBDAjBgNVHREEHDAagRhqZWFuLnJvdXRldEBpbnRyYWNlZC5uZXQwCwYDVR0PBAQ
DAgTwMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBAUAA4GBAFURibwF/dsIzp0W4WyKLrlk94eTH4o25yv5yGSD7XxVIpAG95QeK
xVkE2+4dUTcNbV+ptMWwnFveyfeu41vST7B0e
</X509Certificate>
</X509Data>
</KeyInfo>
</Signature>
</searchRequestRequests>
And a encrypted one :
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<searchRequestRequests messageID="searchBatch-0001"
offerID="/GIP-CPS/OC-SCL/ARGENT-PE-AUTH" protocolVersion="1.0">
<EncryptedData xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2001/04/xmlenc#";
Type="http://www.w3.org/2001/04/xmlenc#Element";>
<EncryptionMethod
Algorithm="http://www.w3.org/2001/04/xmlenc#tripledes-cbc"/>
<KeyInfo xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#";>
<EncryptedKey xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2001/04/xmlenc#";>
<EncryptionMethod Algorithm="http://www.w3.org/2001/04/xmlenc#rsa-1_5"/>
<KeyInfo xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#";>
<KeyName>RA_ADONIS_TEST-1</KeyName>
</KeyInfo>
<CipherData>
<CipherValue>navhaW5bMeRNZtu+gMvYHDZuYd1/AdCHYWfso4i1tBVy9tcRRwhlrIhe
01gytLhh8gSqJ7buSE5f13nVuG9/D+dP4wXEGXoiIRAwSw6LYaLf5hUwbZ2LB7COTUQeJl70xeTYdkgA
C0Dp4pDRbGPBPdlm1y0dkNOzAlZGMvDTflNb+ujVN0PZyTQHN4bYPbvilyu+qO6dhmOIfOdTYV3MxPxB6
hEPcKLS2fqCvaQIbRyRfVb8hCGQFuAUcC56L4fuzu3wA==</CipherValue>
</CipherData>
</EncryptedKey>
</KeyInfo>
<CipherData>
<CipherValue>AAAAAAAAAADhFoP1b5Wjg/9lzuIJs/sktsRRrPHEN4Ipxdwid03CAfbNQWAOM1YLuud
RQXDv9qsplG3FIUuetpJbQ1kIuo58MQZa4fB10UV92NJvwWEs=</CipherValue>
</CipherData>
</EncryptedData>
</searchRequestRequests>
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Berin Lautenbach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Envoyé : mercredi 18 avril 2007 14:05
> À : [email protected]
> Objet : Re: Namespaces
>
> Can you post a signature from the implementation you use to
> see what it looks like?
>
> Cheers,
> Berin
>
> Eric Tournier wrote:
> > Hi Berin :)
> >
> > I'm using a home-made XML Encryption implementation but
> unfortunately I'm not the developer of it. This
> implementation does not support ds: and xenc: prefixes, so I
> try not to have them. In order to test interoperability of it
> with well-known API, I'm trying to encrypt a XML document
> with XML Security and decrypt the result with my
> implementation, and vice-versa.
> > My intent is not to have two different namespaces as the
> default namespace for the Signature element, but trying not
> to have any of the ds: and xenc: prefix into the final
> encrypted then signed XML document : element <Signature
> instead of <ds:Signature and <CipherValue instead of
> <xenc:CipherValue.
> >
> > Thanks for your help
> >
> > Eric
> >
> >> -----Message d'origine-----
> >> De : Berin Lautenbach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé :
> >> mercredi 18 avril 2007 11:36 À :
> [email protected] Objet :
> >> Re: Namespaces
> >>
> >> As far as I can see - effectively your trying to have two
> different
> >> namespaces as the default namespace for the Signature
> element. Which
> >> can't really be done. Or am I misreading your intent?
> >>
> >> Why do you not want the namespaces? Both specs exist inside a
> >> specific namespace, so you can't not use them.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Berin
> >>
> >> Eric Tournier wrote:
> >>> Hi :)
> >>>
> >>> I wish to encrypt then sign a XML document without the
> 'ds;' and
> >>> 'xenc:' namespaces. Unfortunately, I can only suppress on
> of these
> >>> namespaces :| The following code throws
> >> XmlSecurityException always on
> >>> the second line independent from its nature
> >>> (EncryptionConstants.setEncryptionSpecNSprefixor or
> >>> Constants.setSignatureSpecNSprefix) :
> >>> (...)
> >>> static
> >>> {
> >>> org.apache.xml.security.Init.init();
> >>> JCA.setProvider();
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> public XMLSecurityResource() throws XMLSecurityException
> >>> {
> >>> // Suppression du namespace 'xenc:'
> >>> EncryptionConstants.setEncryptionSpecNSprefix("");
> >>> // Suppression du namespace 'ds:'
> >>> Constants.setSignatureSpecNSprefix("");
> >>> }
> >>> (...)
> >>>
> >>> Could someone tell me how to resolve this ?
> >>> Thanks
> >>> Eric
