Mmmm. This heat seems to be getting to me. > -----Original Message----- > From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 14 August 2003 17:04 > To: James Developers List; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Fetchmail patch(es) > > > > The primary change is to add more flexibility as to what > messages are > > fetched and their final disposition on the POP3 server > (asis, deleted, > > marked read). > > OK. And I think something having to do with correcting invalid e-mail > addresses, too.
If a sender address does not include the domain part, the fully qualified hostname of the James server is used. If the fully qualified hostname cannot be determined, localhost is used. This is required to construct a MailAddress which is required to construct a MailImpl, otherwise the mail can't be delivered. > > My concern with [using attributes instead of X-Headers] is that as > > attributes require a database, file based systems will not then be > > able to use fetchmail. > > Huh? Attributes were *first* available for file system > repositories. It > took more work to get them into the database. I haven't tried them and clearly misunderstood some of the messages on the list. In this case I will certainly switch to using attributes. Thanks Noel and Vincenzo. -- Steve --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
