Re: Solution

[Norman Maurer]

Comments inside...

Am 21.11.2009 um 05:10 schrieb Simon Funnell <simonfunn...@googlemail.com 
>:

Hi,

Aspectj is an example of how you could add logging to James  
components later in the inheritance chain. Tools already exist, all  
you need to do is accept this simple fact. If components have  
explicit logging operations, they are flawed. Nothing do with me or  
anyone, its a just a fact. The solution is to write methods without  
logging code, then add it later with a decent aspect orientated  
framework or the like. Its really that simple.

Im still not agree with you about that. Imho logging should be part of  
the "main code". And why is this any better then injecting the Logger  
like every other object. In trunk we even use JSR250 for that so every  
Franework which knows howto handle this Standards should just work...


Are you not bored of explicitly writing logging code in every  
component?

Nope im not bored.

All I am asking is for you to embrace best practice :) but I respect  
the fact people have jobs as well and that this needs to be  
accounted for in the development cycle.

Regards,

Simon

Bye
Norman

Ps: Why you change the subject of the Mail Everytime. 
 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org