[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMAP-193?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Norman Maurer reopened IMAP-193:
--------------------------------


This broke Maildir implementation.. I need to find out why :(

> UIDNEXT generation is a big performance killer and should get reworked
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IMAP-193
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMAP-193
>             Project: JAMES Imap
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 0.1
>            Reporter: Norman Maurer
>            Assignee: Norman Maurer
>             Fix For: 0.2
>
>
> In the store api we generate the uid for a new message and guaranteer that 
> the Mailbox.getLastUid() method will return this value after it is stored. 
> For this we save the message and the mailbox and use for example a row lock 
> (in jpa land) for this to get rid of ghost-reads etc. 
> This is a big performance killer and is not needed at all. In the rfc its 
> clearly stated that the used uid for the next saved message must just be 
> equal or bigger then the UIDNEXT value. 
> From rfc:
>         Note: The next unique identifier value is intended to
>         provide a means for a client to determine whether any
>         messages have been delivered to the mailbox since the
>         previous time it checked this value.  It is not intended to
>         provide any guarantee that any message will have this
>         unique identifier.  A client can only assume, at the time
>         that it obtains the next unique identifier value, that
>         messages arriving after that time will have a UID greater
>         than or equal to that value.
>  

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org

Reply via email to