You can run james with just smtp, locked down to your local ip address. Bounces will go back to the address it's being sent from (not server), so providing another server is set in the mx records for the domain, it will bounce to them.
If you would prefer somthing a little more lightweight than james, i've written a javamail transport which spools mail. It is used in palce of the smtp transport from javamail and uses a disk based spool, and a relay to send messages. A jar (including source) can be found at: http://www.netcase.co.uk/daniel/smtpspool/ Daniel. > -----Original Message----- > From: Tore Halset [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 04 November 2004 08:46 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: use james for outgoing only > > > Hello. (I am a james-newbie, but have read some of the documentation > and the faq.) > > We have an application running inside jboss that needs to send out > email. We are currently using the corporate MS Exchange Server for > outgoing message. The problem happens when the MS Exchange Server is > out of service as we currently do not have a local mailque in our > application. The application does not need to recive emails. > > Could James be a solution to this problem? I have read from the > documentation that it is not recomended to run james inside jboss, but > running it as a separate service is ok. > > Should we allow james to recive emails from the internet to handle > bounces? > > Regards, > - Tore. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
