On 9/19/10 12:41 PM, Mr Dash Four wrote:
> 
>> 4.4.14 will support this syntax:
>>
>>      ACCEPT $FW net:[+dest-ip-map,+dest-port-map],...
>>
>> Using [...] to delimit the ipset list allows embedded [src|dst,...] to
>> be handled easily.
>>   
> I presume whether it would be src or dst will be determined by its 
> positioning, for example:
> 
> ACCEPT $FW[+src-ip-map,src-port-map] net:[+dst-ip-map,+dst-port-map]
> 
> as there won't be any restrictions as to the number of ipsets included.
> 
> Also, would it not make more sense to use this syntax: 
> net:+[dst-ip-map,dst-port-map] or is that not doable (saving a plus sign 
> and it looks more ... logical)?

Good suggestion.

> 
> Another thing I haven't thought of, but you need to account if you are 
> to implement this: currently ipsets with triplets, whatever they are, 
> definitely include a protocol name, so potentially there may be a clash 
> (for example when I have udp in my src triplet and then specify another 
> triplet having tcp protocol as my dst).

I don't understand the problem -- sorry.

-Tom
-- 
Tom Eastep        \ When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather who
Shoreline,         \ died peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming like
Washington, USA     \ all of the passengers in his car
http://shorewall.net \________________________________________________

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances
and start using them to simplify application deployment and
accelerate your shift to cloud computing.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev
_______________________________________________
Shorewall-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users

Reply via email to