On Fri, 5 Jul 2002 10:10:08 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >> ToDO's: >> >> - clearance about the licence >> > We discussed this on the FPC core team meeting this weekend. LGPL >> >doesn't make it possible to link libraries statically unless you plan >> > to distribute the product you're creating under LGPL as well. >> Not right. You can link statically but 'If you link a program with the >> library, you must provide complete object files to the recipients so >> that they can relink them with the library, after making changes to >> the library and recompiling it. ' (preamble) > Would _you_ distribute your commercial application with complete >object files? Why not??? If I want hide something - all hidden. If I distribute project in monolite binary file, then why not to distribute and in multiple binary files?
>Exactly this formulation makes it unusable for serious >commercial projects, IMHO. May be yes, may be no. ----------- To unsubscribe yourself from this list, send the following message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] unsubscribe sibyl end