On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 4:38 PM, Stephen Kent <k...@bbn.com> wrote: > Dave, > > Fair questions for a somewhat complex environment. > > SIDR develops security standards for inter-domain routing, working within > the context of > BGP standards developed by IDR. > > GROW has more of an operations focus, and is intended to provide input to > IDR. > > So, your doc on route leaks, if approved in GROW, could inform IDR about > changes > needed to BGP to counter this problem (which is not contrary to current BGP > semantics). In turn, IDR could elect to revise BGP to address this problem, > and > then IDR could ask SIDR to develop security mechanisms to enable ASes to > enforce the > revised BGP specs, for example.
this does sound like the agreed upon plan ... yes. _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
