On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 12:10 PM, Roque Gagliano (rogaglia) <rogag...@cisco.com> wrote: > Sandra, > > I support this document moving forward to the IESG. > > I read the document as part of the WGLC process and I believe the text is > ready for publication. > > My only question is a formality from Section 3 that says: > > " If a BGP router supports prefix origin validation and is configure for the > extensions defined in this document, the validation step SHOULD be performed > prior to any of the steps defined in the decision process of [RFC4271]." > > (Roque) Should this document specifically be labeled as an update to > RFC4271?
doesn't a prefix-list (or other route-filter) happen prior to the decision process as well though? > > Regards, > Roque > > On Apr 26, 2014, at 1:53 AM, Sandra Murphy <sa...@tislabs.com> wrote: > > The authors of BGP Prefix Origin Validation State Extended Community, > draft-ietf-sidr-origin-validation-signaling-04 have requested a WGLC. > > This message begins a two week WGLC, to end on 9 May 2014. > > The draft is available at > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sidr-origin-validation-signaling. > > Please do send comments to the list, indicating whether you do or do not > believe that the draft is ready for publication. > > --Sandy, speaking as wg co-chair > _______________________________________________ > sidr mailing list > sidr@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr > > > > _______________________________________________ > sidr mailing list > sidr@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr > _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
