sounds like a good topic for the mic/front/preso in dallas... to me at least.
On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 9:34 AM, George, Wes <wesley.geo...@twcable.com> wrote: > I posed some questions about this in my WGLC review of bgpsec spec, but > haven't heard anything back. Current schedule has this being evaluated by > IESG prior to our next meeting. If we need to discuss during the meeting > in Dallas, we could certainly delay processing of the document. It has a > normative block on the bgpsec spec, so it's not like it's getting > published right away anyway. > > Thanks, > > Wes > > > > On 2/6/15, 11:15 AM, "Randy Bush" <ra...@psg.com> wrote: > >>has the wg really looked at 5.2 and 5.3 with respect to how the ibgp >>hacks affect the bgpsec spec? >> >>randy > > > This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable > proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to > copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for > the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not > the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any > dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the > contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be > unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender > immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail > and any printout. > _______________________________________________ > sidr mailing list > sidr@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
