I think this means you are asking for a WGLC, yes? If so we can ship a note to the list (here) about that...
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 12:41 AM, Matthew Lepinski <mlepinski.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > I have submitted a new version of the BGPsec protocol specification. > > This version includes some minor fixes as well as all of the changes > discussed at IETF 92. (Minutes can be found here -- > http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/92/minutes/minutes-92-sidr) I believe that > all open issues with this document have been addressed. > > The only normative changes in the -12 version are the following: > -- BGPsec speakers MUST support the multi-protocol extension (RFC 4760) > -- BGPsec now signs the entire MP_REACH_NLRI attribute. (Recall that there > was an error previously where the AFI was not protected under the signature) > > I believe that this document is now ready to ship to the IESG. If you > disagree, please let me know what still needs to be addressed. > > - Matt Lepinski > > _______________________________________________ > sidr mailing list > sidr@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr > _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
