Pinging this thread to catch anyone who didn't reply but had thoughts I'd like to close this out tomorrow before 5pm EST (10pm UTC).
thanks! -chris On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 9:24 AM, Randy Bush <ra...@psg.com> wrote: >> the intent is an appropriate change to improve robustness of the >> system. > > i think it changes the robustness, not necessarily improves it. the > loss of congruent hierarchic validation is exchanged for accepting some > failures we have yet to see. > > being a bit of a naggumite, accepting errors is not big on my agenda. > one of my disagreements with dr postel was the receiver side of the > robustness principle. this way lies entropic death. > > randy _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
