Restarting this thread, with some updates :) Preparing for Seoul in a few weeks time, with the intent that we do not meet face-to-face in Chicago, have all current 'protocol' related docs to the IESG/done and meet instead in sidr-ops if there are agenda items at that time :)
Currently we have the following in IESG/pub-request status (13 documents): draft-ietf-sidr-adverse-actions draft-ietf-sidr-as-migration draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-algs draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-ops draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-overview draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-pki-profiles draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol draft-ietf-sidr-origin-validation-signaling draft-ietf-sidr-publication draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-oob-setup draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-rtr-rfc6810-bis draft-ietf-sidr-delta-protocol (10/26 sent forward) draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered (10/26 sent forward) Currently still active documents (8 documents): draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-rollover draft-ietf-sidr-lta-use-cases draft-ietf-sidr-route-server-rpki-light draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-tree-validation draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered draft-ietf-sidr-rtr-keying draft-ietf-sidr-slurm (this reflects the changes since the last email, included below) I believe we're still planning to move (and have agreement from authors): draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-rollover draft-ietf-sidr-lta-use-cases draft-ietf-sidr-route-server-rpki-light draft-ietf-sidr-rtr-keying which leaves to be dealt with by Chicago 2 documents: draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-tree-validation draft-ietf-sidr-slurm I think this is good, I believe (and of course I should be corrected if wrong) slurm - more work inbound and discussion planned in Seoul tree-validation - I thought moved to sidr-ops, but don't have docs to back that up. -chris On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 4:56 PM, Chris Morrow <morr...@ops-netman.net> wrote: > > Howdy SIDR peeps, > (+bonus ops ad) > > Following on the Berlin meeting we were trying to accomplish two > things: > > 1) get all documents related to sidr protocols into wglc and then > publication > > 2) get all documents which are more operationally focused moved > along to an ops group (sidr-ops or something akin to that) > > With that in mind there are 8 documents in the publication queue: > draft-ietf-sidr-as-migration > draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-algs > draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-ops > draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-overview > draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-pki-profiles > draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol > draft-ietf-sidr-origin-validation-signaling > draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-rtr-rfc6810-bis > > and 11 still in progress. Of the 11 left Sandy and I think they > roughly break down like: > > Documents which should move to the ops group: > draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-rollover > draft-ietf-sidr-lta-use-cases > draft-ietf-sidr-route-server-rpki-light - authors notified/queried > about this > draft-ietf-sidr-rtr-keying > > documents which should finish out in sidr: > draft-ietf-sidr-delta-protocol > draft-ietf-sidr-publication > draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-oob-setup - pub request in flight > draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-tree-validation > draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered > draft-ietf-sidr-slurm - authors recently updated > draft-ietf-sidr-adverse-actions - wglc imminent > > I think if there's no meaningful discussion on change for these > between now and 9/16/2016 (Sept 16th) we will assume this list is > correct. For documents in the 'move' list, if progress to publication > happens 'good!'. For all documents in the 'stays' list: > 1) we aim to have wglc by Seoul > 2) publication requests started on as many as possible > > We plan to meet in Seoul, but not in Chicago (Mar 2017) where we > expect the ops group to exist and meet. We can progress documents in > SIDR after Seoul, but the WG should close out shortly after the new > year. (or that's the goal). > > Thoughts? > -chris > > _______________________________________________ > sidr mailing list > sidr@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr >
_______________________________________________ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
