> On Jan 12, 2017, at 17:33, Randy Bush <ra...@psg.com> wrote:
> 
> mornin' oliver,
> 
>> This most likely would set a bad example for others that might start
>> issuing certificates with “infinite” life spans.
> 
> 'zactly
> 
>> In this regards what about a Validity of 365 days within the
>> example. This seems feasible to me.
> 
>>> of course that leaves open what lifetime to recommend.  we're not
>>> gonna do oscp, but rather withdraw from the rpki.  so to keep from
>>> making too much bgp noise, let me toss out O(year) to start the
>>> discussion.
> 
> i can live with a year.  i will be interested if others comment.
> 
> i have a vague memory of talking about this before.  one needs to deploy
> the replacement key in advance, as it can take some time to propagate to
> the far corners of the internet.  and one probably does not want to
> reannounce all one's routes at once.
> 
> a small i-d may be in order.

The CPS really dictates the validity period.  Can you check what your RIPE 
issued RPKI certificates have as a validity date?

You’re right that you need to get the replacement cert early to make sure you 
don’t end up being without a certificate.  RFC 6484 recommends 1 week prior to 
the expiration of the old cert.  I think the CPS also allows some addition time 
to account for this problem.

spt
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
sidr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr

Reply via email to