Very well put Lola....Dee

Sent from my iPad

> On 28 Aug 2015, at 05:14, Lola Harris <phoenix23...@tds.net> wrote:
> 
> John, skepticism is always appropriate.  I think (just my opinion) that folks 
> like us are probably more skeptical than the general population.  We do our 
> research and our homework and then try things out.  If we weren't skeptics, we
> would be broke and in pain and have deteriorating health (ie: falling for 
> everything).  We learn to separate the gold from the dross....lol..
> 
> I am sure we come across some duds from time to time but we also discover some
> real gems along the way.  In the world of alternatives, it is the wild, wild
> west 'out there' and there seems to be a wonder cure of the week so.. you 
> learn
> to develop a good 'bs' antennae, if you know what I mean.  For some things, a
> double or single blind study is impossible... like DMSO.  One cannot duplicate
> the odor that comes from using DMSO so, it works but it is impossible to 
> 'test'
> it and meet FDA standards.
> 
> I find it amusing at how vets are so open to 'alternatives' like DMSO and 
> shark
> cartilage for inflammation, for instance.  Their patients (like your dog) are
> impervious to placebo effects and can't rationalize or verbalize their 
> conditions.  
> Something either works with the animals or it doesn't. Personally, I see 
> nothing
> wrong with a placebo effect. If it relieves a condition or pain... why not? 
> They
> say we only use a small fraction of our brain/mind capacity. So, who knows 
> what
> is going on with any certainty?  
> Lola  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: John Popelish <jpopel...@gmail.com>
> To: silver-list@eskimo.com
> Sent: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 23:38:23 -0400 (EDT)
> Subject: Re: CS>electromagnetic instruments
> 
>> On 08/27/2015 10:26 PM, Victor Cozzetto wrote:
>> Uh... John...
>> 
>> You do realize that we are kind of an underground
>> mailing list for a reason, right? ;-) I.e. I don't think
>> that many of us care a lot about peer reviewed
>> publications in medical journals, as that is basically
>> exclusive to big pharmaceutical companies, is often
>> fraudulent (just like drug trials), or is suppressed when
>> it concerns things outside of big pharma control.
> 
> That doesn't mean we have to be gullible. That just invites
> the same sort of abuse from people competing with big
> pharma. I'm open minded, but I try to not let my brain fall out.
> 
> But if reasonable scepticism is out of place here, then I
> will bow out.
> 
> -- 
> Regards,
> 
> John Popelish
> 
> 
> --
> The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
>  Rules and Instructions: http://www.silverlist.org
> 
> Unsubscribe:
>  <mailto:silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com?subject=unsubscribe>
> Archives: 
>  http://www.mail-archive.com/silver-list@eskimo.com/maillist.html
> 
> Off-Topic discussions: <mailto:silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com>
> List Owner: Mike Devour <mailto:mdev...@eskimo.com>
> 
> 
>