w8w8 wrote:
> I suggest you read your bible without a preconceived outcome.
That is what has to be done.
> Since
> Genesis (and the rest of the bible) have hundreds (yes, hundreds) of
> absurdities and inconsistencies it is difficult to know what the bible
> really says. For instance:
>
> There was light ("night and day") (Genesis 1:3) before there was a sun.
> (Genesis 1:16) (Note: If there were no sun, there would be no night or
> day. Also, light from the newly created heavenly bodies seems to have
> reached the earth instantaneously though it now takes thousands or
> millions of years.)
>
You are misinterpreting. Lets see what science says. First there was a big
bang. Initially there was nothing but atomic particles and light. Then
those condenced into matter, that eventually became the sun stars and
planets. For a great deal of infomation on how matter is condenced light see
http://ascension2000.com
That is exactly what the Bible says. As far as the word day, you need to
review the original texts Genesis came from. The texts say period of time,
not day. So once again science and these ancient texts agree, although the
translator mistranslated the indeterminate period to day.
>
> Every plant and tree which yield seed are given to us by God as good to
> eat.(Genesis 1:29) (Note: This would include poisonous plants such as
> hemlock, buckeye pod, nightshade, oleander.)
>
I don't find this anywhere. What translation and what verse?
>
> Genesis 3:14-16 God curses the serpent, Eve, and Adam for what they have
> done. (Note: This is inconsistent with God's omniscience; God should
> have known full well, ahead of time, what the outcome would be. Since
> God created the three as well as the Tree of Knowledge, he is ultimately
> responsible for the Fall.)
>
OK, the translators once again are confused. They translate 3 different
words into the one word "God", The Creator, the masters and the planets. If
you check the original texts, this was the masters. Also where the sons of
the Gods found the daughters of man beautiful and mated with them, they are
talking about the masters as well.
Genesis is about 1/100 the length of the original text it came from. The
creater created the space time continium, stars plants and so forth. The
masters created man in their own image, using dna from themselves and apes.
Man was a slave to the masters, and they were not suppose to reproduce. One
of the masters was a DNA specialist, a doctor, who's sign was DNA, which was
seen as snakes, thus he had the nickname of serpent. He gave the humans the
forbidden fruit, that is capability of reproducing, and the other masters
were really pissed about it. As far as God the creator, all this was within
the rights of free will and was of no real consequence from a spiritual
development viewpoint. It is all experience for the Creator, and thus is
good.
>
> If you want to explore these absurdities and inconsistencies further, I
> suggest it NOT be done under the guise of being silver related.
I agree, that is why I am emailing you off the list. Grab the 12th planet.
Stitchen is an excellent researcher who has researched the original Sumerian
documents and shows that science and the history recorded in the documents
are 100% in accordance with each other. But of course one would expect it
since the information was provided originally by the masters who knew where
they came from as well as where we came from.
Marshall
--
The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.
To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to:
silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com -or- silver-digest-requ...@eskimo.com
with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line.
To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com
Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html
List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@eskimo.com>
