> Hi Brett, > > Yep, I think you're right. I'm really not sure if I'm correct. :)
> Cheers, > Attila > > PS But I really wish the UAC would cease retransmitting its INVITEs. > I'm sure there's a rule about that somewhere ;-) Unfortunately, Gary it correct about rfc3581 recommending resending the INVITE. > -----Original Message----- > From: Brett Tate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tue 12/12/2006 19:05 > To: Attila Sipos; Siddhartha Bhakta; > sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu > Cc: > Subject: RE: [Sip-implementors] Retransmitted INVITE > after PRACK-200OKexchange > > > > > I think that the right way to respond is to resend > > the last provisional response. > > Hi Attila, > > The main reason that I think the UAS should not respond > is because of > the following text from rfc3262 section 3. My > interpretation assumes > "SHOULD cease retransmissions" applies to both those > desiring PRACK and > those triggered by retry of INVITE. > > " Retransmissions of the reliable provisional response > cease when a > matching PRACK is received by the UA core." > > " If the PRACK does match an unacknowledged reliable provisional > response, it MUST be responded to with a 2xx response. > The UAS can be > certain at this point that the provisional response has > been received in > order. It SHOULD cease retransmissions of the reliable > provisional > response, and MUST remove it from the list of > unacknowledged provisional > responses." > > > _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
