Greetings, RFC3261 section 17.2.3 indicates that the Via sent-by is used as part of the transaction matching when the magic cookie is present. The Via sent-by usually reflects the meaning presented within Via's bnf. Does the "sent-by" portion of the matching rules really just include Via's "sent-by" or would it somehow also include Via's "received" instead/also when present?
The following "malicious" text from 17.2.3 is what always causes me a little confusion since duplicating sent-by seems relatively easy if someone is actually maliciously duplicating the branch. " The sent-by value is used as part of the matching process because there could be accidental or malicious duplication of branch parameters from different clients." Thanks is advance for a response, Brett _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
