Bugs item #805716, was opened at 2003-09-13 13:44
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by brianfinley
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100259&aid=805716&group_id=259

Category: None
Group: v3.2.0
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 6
Submitted By: Brian Elliott Finley (brianfinley)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: re-gen ssh keys after imaging

Initial Comment:
Add code to autoinstallscript to re-gen host-side ssh keys:

> To be explicit, I'm referring to the host's keys,

that are typically

> found in ssh's etc directory, such as:

>

>     /etc/ssh/ssh_host_dsa_key

>     /etc/ssh/ssh_host_dsa_key.pub

>     /etc/ssh/ssh_host_rsa_key

>     /etc/ssh/ssh_host_rsa_key.pub





Add option (--no-ssh-keygen) to

SystemImager::Options->getimage_options_body();



If --no-ssh-keygen, or --replicant, then

$no_ssh_keygen=true, and don't regen keys.



-Brian

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Brian Elliott Finley (brianfinley)
Date: 2003-09-14 20:21

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=140

I think it could be done in systemconfigurator or

systemimager.  I know how to, and can do it in systemimager

very easily.  The one advantage to doing it in

systemconfigurator is SC's general concept of "fingerprint"

then "act".  In this case, the finger print would simply be

where are the key files.



If we do it in systemconfigurator, I would definitely want

an option in systemconfigurator that would allow it to be

done, or not done.  That way, a SystemImager user can easily

choose to do it or not, regardless of image type.



Are you interested in doing the coding to put it into

systemconfigurator?  I'm not as familiar with that code.



-Brian

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: dann frazier (dannf)
Date: 2003-09-14 19:37

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=146718

this definitely seems like a systemconfigurator thing to me,

and should be quite easy to add to its architecture.  the

way we call sc wouldn't even have to change.



----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100259&aid=805716&group_id=259


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Sisuite-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sisuite-devel

Reply via email to