Thus spake Bernard Li ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Been talking with Matt Jamison about package dependency issues with the
initrd_template package.
Now that I've put more thought into it, I think this package needs to be
architecture dependent
I disagree.
, since you can only run si_prepareclient on the
architecture you're on.
This is true. However, when we do get si_mkbootpackage updated to work
with UYOK code, it may be run on a server, to build a boot package for a
machine of a different architecture.
Furthermore, I think that the
systemimager-client package needs to be dependent on the
<arch>initrd_template package since si_prepareclient won't run without
it.
I do agree that systemimager-client should be dependent on
an initrd_template that is appropriate for the architecture in question.
But, I realize it may be difficult, if not impossible, to impart these
relationships on the (rpm at least) packaging system.
So, let me cook on this. Hopefully I'll send a fresh thread to the list
with a simplified packaging scheme that we can discuss.
Makes sense?
Cheers,
Bernard
--
Brian Elliott Finley
Mobile: 630.631.6621
-------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Sisuite-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sisuite-devel
