Ala Salman wrote:
> On Wednesday 27 December 2006 06:41, Andrea Righi wrote:
> 
>> Maybe /etc/iftab is the source of the problem...
>>
> 
> /etc/iftab looks ok with the proper eth0 and eth1 and their mac address's 
> present.

So if this file is in your image all the clients will receive it, but
only the golden client has the correct mac addresses... a generic client
simply skip them (eth0 and eth1) and starts with eth2....

> 
>> Maybe /var/run and /var/lock are mounted using tmpfs... can you post the
>> output of df in your golden client (and also the content of /etc/mtab)?
> 
> 
> Golden client's df:
> 
> Filesystem           1K-blocks      Used Available Use% Mounted on
> /dev/sda1              1829159    175230   1556336  11% /
> varrun                 2022352        48   2022304   1% /var/run
> varlock                2022352         0   2022352   0% /var/lock
> procbususb             2022352        32   2022320   1% /proc/bus/usb
> udev                   2022352        32   2022320   1% /dev
> devshm                 2022352         0   2022352   0% /dev/shm
> /dev/sda3             36527188    376144  34295540   2% /usr
> /dev/sda4             19243772    247936  18018284   2% /var
> 
> golden client /etc/mtab:
> 
> /dev/sda1 / ext3 rw,errors=remount-ro 0 0
> proc /proc proc rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev 0 0
> /sys /sys sysfs rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev 0 0
> varrun /var/run tmpfs rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev,mode=0755 0 0
> varlock /var/lock tmpfs rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev,mode=1777 0 0
> procbususb /proc/bus/usb usbfs rw 0 0
> udev /dev tmpfs rw,mode=0755 0 0
> devshm /dev/shm tmpfs rw 0 0
> devpts /dev/pts devpts rw,gid=5,mode=620 0 0
> /dev/sda3 /usr ext3 rw 0 0
> /dev/sda4 /var ext3 rw 0 0
> 
> golden client output from /proc/mounts:
> 
> rootfs / rootfs rw 0 0
> /dev/root / ext3 rw,data=ordered 0 0
> proc /proc proc rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec 0 0
> sysfs /sys sysfs rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec 0 0
> tmpfs /var/run tmpfs rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec 0 0
> tmpfs /var/lock tmpfs rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec 0 0
> /dev/root /dev/.static/dev ext3 rw,data=ordered 0 0
> udev /dev tmpfs rw 0 0
> tmpfs /dev/shm tmpfs rw 0 0
> devpts /dev/pts devpts rw 0 0
> usbfs /dev/bus/usb/.usbfs usbfs rw 0 0
> udev /proc/bus/usb tmpfs rw 0 0
> usbfs /proc/bus/usb/.usbfs usbfs rw 0 0
> tmpfs /var/run tmpfs rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec 0 0
> tmpfs /var/lock tmpfs rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec 0 0
> /dev/sda3 /usr ext3 rw,data=ordered 0 0
> /dev/sda4 /var ext3 rw,data=ordered 0 0
> tmpfs /var/run tmpfs rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec 0 0
> tmpfs /var/lock tmpfs rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec 0 0
> tmpfs /var/run tmpfs rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec 0 0
> tmpfs /var/lock tmpfs rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec 0 0
> 
> /var/run and /var/lock are both mounted four times?  These two are missing 
> from the out of df in the cloned system.
> 
> Ala
> 

Maybe there are mounted over the old mountpoints, but it shouldn't be a
real problem..

Since it's tmpfs, they're skipped during the image retrieval, but the
mountpoints should be present in your autoinstallscript.conf. Could you
post it?

Regards,
-Andrea

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Sisuite-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sisuite-users

Reply via email to