Andrea Righi wrote:
> wtautz wrote:
>   
>> Andrea Righi wrote:
>>     
>>> wtautz wrote:
>>>   
>>>       
>>>> Andrea Righi wrote:
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>>>> wtautz wrote:
>>>>>   
>>>>>       
>>>>>           
>>>>>> Hi, I have noticed that on some autoinstalled clients that
>>>>>> the root / directory has permissions:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> drwxr-x--x
>>>>>>
>>>>>> where as the golden client has drwxr-xr-x
>>>>>>
>>>>>> the golden client is Ubuntu Feisty, amd64 and I used systemimager
>>>>>> version 3.8.2-2
>>>>>> and the same version on the server.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is this a known behaviour?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> walter
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     
>>>>>>         
>>>>>>             
>>>>> It doesn't seem to happen with 3.9.6, anyway AFAIR nothing have been 
>>>>> changed in
>>>>> this front, so it's should be the same also with 3.8.2.
>>>>>
>>>>> What are the permissions of your image in /var/lib/systemimager/images on 
>>>>> your
>>>>> image server?
>>>>>   
>>>>>       
>>>>>           
>>>> 0755 root.root
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>> And what about permissions in your overrides 
>>> (/var/lib/systemimager/overrides/*)?
>>>
>>>   
>>>       
>> /var/lib/systemimager/overrides# ls -al
>> total 28
>> drwxr-xr-x 6 root root 4096 Sep  6 15:04 .
>> drwxr-xr-x 5 root root 4096 Sep 18 09:31 ..
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2566 Aug  5 14:17 README
>> drwxr-x--x 2 root root 4096 Aug 28 12:54 cpu-linux-2007-fall
>> drwxr-x--x 2 root root 4096 Aug 28 15:49 frontend-linux-2007-fall
>> drwxr-x--x 2 root root 4096 Aug 20 12:21 lwsfall2007
>> drwxr-x--x 2 root root 4096 Aug 31 15:02 old-frontend-image
>>
>>
>> which explains what I am seeing.... I guess. Each of these is an empty
>> directory.
>>     
>
> Yes. If you're using at least one of those overrides the permission bits will 
> be
> set in the root of the installed client, since overrides are copied after the
> image (by definition). To resolve just set the appropriate permissions in the
> override dirs. Anyway I don't know why you've that permission mask, probably
> it's due to your "umask" setting for root.
>
>   

Perhaps you should add a little bit of code to make sure the umask is
set appropriately? Assuming the problem I am seeing is due to that.

Walter


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
sisuite-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sisuite-users

Reply via email to