Index: si_installbtimage
===================================================================
--- si_installbtimage   (revision 4445)
+++ si_installbtimage   (working copy)
@@ -239,7 +239,7 @@
 print "Starting first image server seeder...\n";
 if ($quiet) {
     $PIDFILE = '/var/run/systemimager-server-btseeder.pid';
-    open(PID, "$launchmany $TORRENT_DIR --max_upload_rate 0
--rerequest_interval 1 $twisted $trackerless $upnp --bind $image_server
0</dev/null 1>/dev/null 2>&1 & echo \$!|");
+    open(PID, "$launchmany $TORRENT_DIR --max_upload_rate 0
--rerequest_interval 300 $twisted $trackerless $upnp --bind $image_server
0</dev/null 1>/dev/null 2>&1 & echo \$!|");
     my $pid = <PID>;
     close(PID);
     open(OUT, ">$PIDFILE") or die("ERROR: cannot open $PIDFILE for
writing!\n");
@@ -265,7 +265,7 @@
 EOF
 `;
     my $bt_ui = ($?) ? $launchmany : $launchmany_curses;
-    system "$bt_ui $TORRENT_DIR --max_upload_rate 0 --rerequest_interval 1
$twisted $trackerless $upnp --bind $image_server";
+    system "$bt_ui $TORRENT_DIR --max_upload_rate 0 --rerequest_interval
300 $twisted $trackerless $upnp --bind $image_server";
 }
 print "done.\n";
  

Thanks,
Thomas Krause

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Andrea
Righi
Gesendet: Dienstag, 22. April 2008 12:51
An: [email protected]
Betreff: Re: [sisuite-users] bittorrent: rerequest_interval set too low?

Thomas Krause wrote:
> IIRC the bittorrent seeder running on the image-server will register 
> himself at the tracker, so that the tracker can give other clients the 
> ip of the image server. For these other clients a small interval may be 
> good, so that they are informed early when new sources are available. 
> However, since the peer running on the image server is only a seeder and 
> doesn’t need clients to download from, I don’t think this is needed. Or 
> am I missing something?

Correct.

> I changed the interval on my server to the default of 5 minutes and I 
> will see in a few days if the imaging still works.

Seems absolutely reasonable. Post a patch please and I'll check it in
trunk.

Thanks,
-Andrea

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javao
ne
_______________________________________________
sisuite-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sisuite-users

Attachment: adjust_btrerequest_interval.patch
Description: Binary data

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
sisuite-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sisuite-users

Reply via email to