"Laurent Bercot" <ska-skaw...@skarnet.org> writes: > Thanks for the kind words, Oli :) > It's all fine, really. In all fairness, yes, I *was* a little cheeky, > because Esben sounded very dramatic about a harmless warning.
Hehe. I am sorry if it came out like that. My position is just that after upgrading to latest s6-linux-init version, I realized that the customer would with 99% certainty demand that this particular warning message is resolved. And I would very much want to avoid having to carry out-of-tree patches. > But there's a legitimate UX takeaway here: the warning is indeed > needlessly scary. So it will be changed in the next s6-l-i release. > And yes, I suppose I can add the verbosity setting while I'm at it > (it doesn't sound super useful, but it's not expensive either, so if > people want it, why not.) Thanks a lot. Much appreciated :) /Esben
