I suppose it is intended. Stores get resolved over the Uri class and will be enlisted into the current transaction only if they not already are. So, there should be no problem.

Although not completely on topic, have a look at:

http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]&msgNo=2117

Oliver

Stefan Lützkendorf wrote:

Hello,

currently it is possible to map multiple scope to the same store, e.g.

  <scope match="/" store="memory" />
  <scope match="/scope1" store="xis"/>
  <scope match="/scope2" store="xis"/>
  <scope match="/scope3" store="xis"/>

Is this an intended usage, and can we rely on this while writing a store?

Thanks in advance,
Stefan Lützkendorf






---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to