DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36689>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36689 Summary: TxXMLFileDescriptorStore vs. AbstractTxFileStore - threadlocal collission? Product: Slide Version: Nightly Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: Stores AssignedTo: slide-dev@jakarta.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In TxXMLFileDescriptorStore, various parts do things like: activeTransactionBranch.set(txContext); but in the AbstractTXFileStore service, you get requests like... activeTransactionBranch.set(txId); - With completely different types. So, here's the question: Was it *intended* that TxXMLFileDescriptorStore would be overwriting the contents of activeTransactionBranch's thread local data with an object of a different type? -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
