My position is that I will be using slide at work no matter what, but if the project stalls for too long I will be using what amounts to a fork and that is a monumental waste. I want to be able to contribute back to the project as much as possible and a fork doesn't allow me to do that.
-----Original Message----- From: Fabrice Dewasmes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 21, 2005 11:39 AM To: Slide Developers Mailing List Subject: Re: BUG in versioning helper Ray Sprinkle wrote: >I share your concern about the dev team. I use slide at work and have been >submitting small patches and helping on the user list but have seen no >activity from the committers. > >There is a limit to how much time I can contribute > Same here... Unfortunately > but I would like to see the project moving forward again. Slide is not > perfect and there may be better architectures out there but: It works now! > Lots of incremental improvements are possible and I would like to see them > continue. > > I would add that failing to have any answer to this email/thread would be of very bad news as this would (may) mean that no committer feel concerned. For me Slide is of great interest as its implementation is in java AND works... I would be very disappointed that this project becomes stalled. Fabrice Dewasmes >-----Original Message----- >From: Fabrice Dewasmes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Friday, October 21, 2005 9:50 AM >To: Slide Developers Mailing List >Subject: BUG in versioning helper > >Please correct me if I'm wrong but it seems that versioning helper suffers >from a little bug in the update method. The webDAV spec mentions that all dead >properties of previous VR should be copied to VCR in case of uncheckout. So a >call is made to update from the uncheckout method. >The comments say that the dead properties are being copied from VR to VCR but >the code "says" something else. Please see proposed patch for this and tell me >if I'm wrong. For me this bug as been introduced when ResourceKind were >introduced. > >If things are OK I can file this in bugzilla and post patch. > >However, i'd lik eto mention that it's the fourth patch I submit since a few >months and none of them have been integrated...... Again, I'm a bit worried >about slide dev team, is it still alive ? > >Fabrice > >Index: VersioningHelper.java >=================================================================== >RCS file: >/home/cvspublic/jakarta-slide/src/webdav/server/org/apache/slide/webdav >/util/VersioningHelper.java,v >retrieving revision 1.118 >*diff -u -r1.118 VersioningHelper.java* >*--- VersioningHelper.java 25 Feb 2005 16:57:55 -0000 1.118* >*+++ VersioningHelper.java 21 Oct 2005 13:39:38 -0000* >@@ -1578,7 +1578,7 @@ > while (propertyEnum.hasMoreElements()) { > NodeProperty p = (NodeProperty)propertyEnum.nextElement(); > //if( !p.isLiveProperty() ) { >- if (resourceKind.isSupportedLiveProperty(p.getPropertyName())) { >+ if >+ (!resourceKind.isSupportedLiveProperty(p.getPropertyName())) { > vcrRevisionDescriptor.setProperty(p); > } > } > > >-- >Fabrice Dewasmes >Responsable du domaine urbanisation des systèmes d'information >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >06.89.88.65.37 >-- >Open Wide >14 rue Gaillon >75002 PARIS >www.openwide.fr > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- Fabrice Dewasmes Responsable du domaine urbanisation des systèmes d'information [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06.89.88.65.37 -- Open Wide 14 rue Gaillon 75002 PARIS www.openwide.fr --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
