If the key feature you're needing is a revision control system, go with Subversion (or CVS if you must). Slide was designed to be a WebDAV-enabled content management system. It brings a lot more features to the table than either SVN or CVS (DASL, ACLs, BINDing), but the version control pieces are (in my opinion) harder to deal with than the other options.
Another important consideration is client support. There are a lot of SVN/CVS clients, but very few WebDAV clients that support version control. -James On Wed, 2004-12-29 at 16:13 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hello all, > > Just came across Slide since considering using a few Apache systems > like Lenya / Cocoon / Jetspeed. Seems Slide has support for version > control, so wondering if Slide is considered an alternative to CVS or > SVN/Subversion. When should Slide be used, and when should CVS or SVN > be used? > > Thanks, > Richard > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
