On Mon, 31 Jul 2017, Tignor, Tom wrote:

I THINK, and I am not 100% sure of this, but looking at the code it appears 
to do this is

that the failover process will wait for each of the non-failed nodes to 
receive/confirm the FAILOVER event before finishng the failover process.


>
>       Hi Steve,
>       A question on one item:
>
>        - Fix some failover issues when doing a multi-node failover
>          with a cascaded node.
>
>       In cascaded node failover, is it necessary to sync with every receiver 
> node for a failed over set? Or is it sufficient to sync only with nodes 
> directly subscribing to the failed over node? Hoping for the latter!
>       Thanks,
>
>       Tom    (
>
>
> On 7/30/17, 10:15 PM, "Steve Singer" <st...@ssinger.info> wrote:
>
>
>    I am thinking of releasing slony 2.2.6 later this week or early next week.
>    Changes are checked into git on the REL_2_2_STABLE branch.
>
>    Our version detection code doesn't work with the PG10+ version numbering. I
>    wasn't planning on backporting these changes to 2.1 or earlier but someone
>    could if they really wanted to.
>
>
>    The following are the changes I am planning on including in 2.2.6
>
>       - slonik_build_env can now accept multiple -schema options on the 
> command
>    line
>        - Support for PG10. This involved changes to PG version detection
>        - Disallow createEvent and data changes in the same transaction.
>          This also fixes some issues when the logApply trigger invokes the
>          data change trigger by inserting into a table with a trigger that
>          in turns inserts into another replicated table.
>        - Fix some failover issues when doing a multi-node failover
>          with a cascaded node.
>        - Bug 341 - suppress log trigger/deny when running in 'local' mode
>
>
>
>    If I don't hear any objections, or requests for more time to test I work
>    through the release process when I have a chance, likely Monday.
>
>    Steve
>
>    _______________________________________________
>    Slony1-general mailing list
>    Slony1-general@lists.slony.info
>    http://lists.slony.info/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general
>
>
>

_______________________________________________
Slony1-general mailing list
Slony1-general@lists.slony.info
http://lists.slony.info/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general

Reply via email to