On 5/9/2012 5:45 PM, Ari Shapiro wrote: >> Are you sure it wouldn't be easier to define BOOST_FILESYSTEM_VERSION >> somewhere? > > That would probably be the best way to handle this. But in the meantime, you > can return 'true' from the validate_path() function and ignore that > file-checking code.
Thanks, but I thought of another way: in the top-level CMakeLists.txt, add another include_directory, coming before all the others, pointing to my non-installed boost 1.44 header hierarchy. The saga will continue tomorrow... -- James W. Walker, Innoventive Software LLC <http://www.frameforge3d.com/> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Smartbody-developer mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/smartbody-developer
