Thanks for the aid.  One last question, you mentioned:
 
In a case where a white rule is present and a black rule is present the
white rule will always win
 
So if the White Rule fired 000, it would override a Porn Rule of 54?  If so, how are 
these White Rules entered?  
 
Thanks,
 
Keith

        -----Original Message----- 
        From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Madscientist 
        Sent: Wed 3/3/2004 6:01 PM 
        To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
        Cc: 
        Subject: Re: [sniffer] Rules Question
        
        

        At 04:55 PM 3/3/2004, you wrote:
        >I am using Declude and have indiv. Sniffer Tests and lets say the
        >following gets tripped in an email
        >
        >SNIFFER-WHTLIST result code 000
        >SNIFFER-PORN    result code 054
        >
        >Which would take precedence over the other, as far as which would be the
        >final code passed to Declude?
        
        There is some confusion about this.
        
        A zero result from Message Sniffer as seen by Declude could mean that a
        white rule has fired, or it could mean that no rules matched at all.
        
        In the first case - where an actual white rule has fired, the Message
        Sniffer log will show a "White" entry and the "Final" result will reflect
        that white rule. In this case, the white rule takes precedence. Declude
        will see a 0 result code.
        
        In the second case - where no rules matched, the Message Sniffer log will
        show a "Clean" entry and Declude will see a zero result.
        
        So, from Declude's perspective it will see a zero result in both the
        "Clean" and the "White" case. As a result, your SNIFFER-WHTLIST result code
        000 test will fire.
        
        In a case where a white rule is present and a black rule is present the
        white rule will always win. So, if Sniffer saw both rules match a message
        it would return a zero result.
        
        SNIFFER-WHTLIST is a misnomer. It's probably not a good idea to name the
        zero result test this way because most of the time a zero result doesn't
        mean "White" but instead means "Clean".
        
        If you wish to have the white rules in your rulebase separated out then we
        could code those to a 1 result and then you would be able to legitimately
        create a SNIFFER-WHTLIST test checking for a result of 1.
        
        I will point out here that this has been tried once or twice and in both
        cases the user switched back almost immediately because the results were
        confusing.
        
        In Sniffer we use white rules to force a "non result" more than we ever use
        them to indicate a true "white" result.
        
        Hope this helps,
        _M
        
        
        
        
        This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and 
(un)subscription instructions go to 
http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html
        

<<winmail.dat>>

Reply via email to