Matt Matt Matt.

 

Then everyone would have to make sure they made the relevant changes on their systems.

 

As we have seen on the Declude Junkmail list, there will always be those who set up their systems and then forget about them. Making a change like that would cause problems.

 

John Tolmachoff

Engineer/Consultant/Owner

eServices For You

 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent:
Saturday, September 18, 2004 5:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [sniffer] Test ordering/precedence

 

Pete,

Given some of the recent changes in the result codes for Sniffer, I thought I would inquire about the precedence of the result codes and how these can affect systems.

On my system I have weighted the result codes differently and overall, I would consider the following order to be suggestive of the order of reliability from the most reliable to the least reliable.  Note that this is not scientific, but instead based on doing review and tests that hit less often could appear higher in terms of stated reliability though I have considered this in making the list:

1.    SNIFFER-INK(56)
       SNIFFER-CASINO(59)
       SNIFFER-INSURANCE(48)
       SNIFFER-MEDIA(50)
       SNIFFER-GETRICH(57)
       SNIFFER-DEBT(58)
       SNIFFER-PHARMACY(52)

2.    SNIFFER-AVSOFT(49)
       SNIFFER-PHISHING(53)

3.    SNIFFER-TRAVEL(47)
       SNIFFER-PORN(54)

4.    SNIFFER-SPAMWARE(51)
       SNIFFER-OBFUSCATION(61)
       SNIFFER-MALWARE(55)

5.    SNIFFER-EXPERIMENTAL(62)

6.    SNIFFER-GENERAL(63)

7.    SNIFFER-IP(60)


I'm not sure exactly how Sniffer orders the precedence of the result code, but I would like to recommend that you give some consideration to reviewing such things in light of recent changes and also maybe consider allowing us to customize the precedence as a part of our rulebase.

Thanks,

Matt

-- 
=====================================================
MailPure custom filters for Declude JunkMail Pro.
http://www.mailpure.com/software/
=====================================================

Reply via email to